Feature | Radiation Oncology | July 17, 2015

Study suggests lowering dose could maintain survival rates while reducing radiation side effects

low-risk prostate cancer, increased radiation, survival benefit, Perelman

July 17, 2015 - Increased radiation dose is associated with higher survival rates in men with medium- and high-risk prostate cancer, but not those at low risk, according to a new study from Penn Medicine Already-high survival rates for men with low-risk prostate cancer were unaffected by higher radiation dosages compared to lower radiation dosages, according to the study published in JAMA Oncology.

In 2014, low-risk prostate cancer was the most common type of prostate cancer diagnosed in the United States, affecting about 150,000 patients, many of whom undergo aggressive treatment - either complete removal of the prostate or radiation.

"Our study raises the provocative question of whether radiation dose reduction for patients with low-risk prostate cancer could achieve similar cure rates while avoiding the increased risk of side effects associated with higher radiation doses," said the study's lead author, Anusha Kalbasi, M.D., a resident in the Department of Radiation Oncology at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.

Doctors divide localized prostate cancer (prostate cancer that is only in the prostate gland and which has not spread outside of the prostate) into three risk groups. Low-risk prostate cancers are unlikely to grow or spread for many years. Medium-risk cancers are unlikely to grow or spread for a few years. High-risk cancers may grow or spread within a few years. Three criteria are generally used for classifying prostate cancer risk: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, and T stage. PSA is a protein produced by both normal and cancerous prostate cells; a high level of PSA can be a sign of cancer. The Gleason score is a qualitative assessment of any cancer cells that may be present. T stage refers to the size and extension of tumors.

Radiation therapy is associated with side effects and those side effects have been shown to increase with radiation dose, said Kalbasi. For patients undergoing prostate radiation, side effects include, fatigue, urinary frequency and urgency, changes in bowel habits, and erectile dysfunction.

Using data from a National Cancer Database, the study employed specialized analytic methods to compare the survival rates of 42,481 men in the absence of a randomized clinical trial. Some men received a standard dose of radiation while others received higher dose radiation. For men with medium- and high-risk forms of prostate cancer, the study found that for every incremental increase in radiation dose, there was a 7.8 percent and 6.3 percent reduction in the rate of death from any cause. For men with low-risk cancer, no differences in survival were found whether they received the standard dosage of radiation or a higher dosage.

The study is the first to link increased radiation dose with higher survival rates. Previous studies have linked increased radiation dose with two key measures: steady prostate-specific antigen (PSA) scores and the absence of re-growth in tumors of the prostate following successful radiation.

The Penn-led team examined men who were diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2004 and 2006 and followed through 2012. In 2004, 56 percent of these men received higher dosages of radiation. Today, the figure is approximately 90 percent.

Kalbasi and his colleagues found that in the low-risk group, seven-year adjusted survival rates were 86 percent for both standard-dose and higher-dose patients. In the medium-risk group, seven-year adjusted survival rates were 82 percent and 78 percent for higher-dose and standard-dose patients, respectively. In the high-risk group, seven-year adjusted survival rates were 74 percent and 69 percent for higher-dose and standard-dose patients respectively.

"Our findings show that the dose of radiation should be personalized to the specific characteristics of the prostate tumor," said Justin Bekelman, M.D., an associate professor of radiation oncology at Penn, and the study's senior author. "For some patients, personalized treatment will lower the chances of toxicity while maintaining similar survival rates; for other patients, personalized treatment will mean escalating radiation dose to achieve the highest survival while protecting normal tissues, like the bladder and rectum."

For more information: www.med.upenn.edu


Related Content

News | Lung Imaging

Sept. 8, 2026 – Brainomix and Endeavor BioMedicines recently presented positive results from the Brainomix AI-driven ...

Time September 09, 2026
arrow
News | Ultrasound Imaging

Sept. 2, 2026 – Sonex Health and The Institute of Advanced Ultrasound Guided Procedures have announced publication of ...

Time September 04, 2026
arrow
News | Radiation Oncology

Sept. 2, 2026 — Children with one of the deadliest forms of brain cancer may benefit from an additional course of ...

Time September 03, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Imaging

Sept. 1, 2026— A new study from the Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute found that the odds of imaging following an ...

Time September 01, 2026
arrow
News | RSNA

Aug. 18, 2026 —The board of trustees of the Radiological Society of North America's (RSNA) Research & Education (R&E) ...

Time August 24, 2026
arrow
News | Radiation Therapy

Aug. 13, 2026 — An updated clinical guideline from the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) provides evidence ...

Time August 17, 2026
arrow
News | Prostate Cancer

Aug. 13, 2026 — Artera has announced the enrollment of the first patient in its DIRECT-AI registry study, marking the ...

Time August 14, 2026
arrow
News | Innovative Hospitals

July 27, 2026 — Vanderbilt Health and Siemens Healthineers have entered into a multi-year, $87 million Value ...

Time July 28, 2026
arrow
News | ASTRO

July 22, 2026 — The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) has announced the 39 members who will receive the ...

Time July 23, 2026
arrow
News | PET Imaging

July 14, 2026 — New research is shedding new light on the biological basis of schizophrenia by directly measuring ...

Time July 15, 2026
arrow
Subscribe Now