Feature | Radiology Business | May 04, 2016

FDA Establishing National Evaluation System for Medical Devices

New system will combine data from different sources to generate higher-quality evidence for medical device evaluation and regulatory decision-making

FDA, CDRH, national evaluation system, medical device development

May 4, 2016 — The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced it is building the foundations of a national evaluation system to generate better evidence more efficiently for medical device evaluation and regulatory decision-making. The agency said a national evaluation system would generate evidence across the total product lifecycle of medical devices by strategically and systematically leveraging real-world evidence, and applying advanced analytics to data tailored to the unique data needs and innovation cycles of medical devices.

The collaborative national evaluation system will link and synthesize data from different sources across the medical device landscape, including clinical registries, electronic health records and medical billing claims. The FDA said such a system will help improve the quality of real-world evidence that healthcare providers and patients can use to make better informed treatment decisions and strike the right balance between assuring safety and fostering device innovation and patient access.

The system evolved out of a vision for a medical device post-market surveillance system described in two FDA white papers. The initial report, "Strengthening Our National System for Medical Device Post-market Surveillance," was issued in 2012 and provides an overview of FDA's medical device post-market authorities and the current U.S. medical device post-market surveillance system. The update to the report, issued in 2013, details the concrete steps that will promote more efficient collection of better and more timely data, helping to identify issues more quickly. Subsequently, FDA issued two five-year program announcements (PAR-13-202 and PAR-13-232) requesting proposals from prospective partners to build the scientific infrastructure and methodology necessary to further develop and implement these plans through cooperative agreements.

Under a cooperative agreement with FDA, the Brookings Institution convened a multi-stakeholder planning board as described in the 2013 update. In February 2015, the planning board issued a report titled, "Strengthening Patient Care: Building a National Post-market Medical Device Surveillance System" that sets out the key steps towards development of a national system for development, regulation and effective use of medical devices, while supporting improvements in patient safety and health outcomes.

The system was renamed an "evaluation system" to reflect the broad evidence needs of stakeholders with the August 2015 release of the report "Recommendations for a National Medical Device Evaluation System: Strategically Coordinated Registry Networks to Bridge the Clinical Care and Research." MDEpiNet, a broad-based public-private partnership initially envisioned and launched by FDA in 2010, produced this report and is working to build infrastructure, and develop tools and methods for the national system.

In 2016, the Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy published "Better Evidence on Medical Devices: A Coordinating Center for a 21st Century National Medical Device Evaluation System." This document further clarifies the expectations, roles and responsibilities of the coordinating center described in the 2015 planning board report. This additional detail provides insight into the expected business practices of an independent, transparent coordinating center that would guide the future development and implementation of the national evaluation system.

The Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) said that establishing a national evaluation system for medical devices is one of its 2016-2017 strategic priorities.

For more information: www.fda.gov

Related Content

CMS Proposes New Alternative Payment Model for Radiation Oncology
News | Radiation Oncology | July 17, 2019
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposal for an advanced alternative payment model (APM)...
Routine scan of abdomen pelvis taken with the UW-Madison’s Revolution 256 CT scanner using the FDA-cleared reconstruction algorithm, called TrueFidelity.

Routine scan of abdomen pelvis taken with the UW-Madison’s Revolution 256 CT scanner using the FDA-cleared reconstruction algorithm, called TrueFidelity. UW-Madison was the first site in the U.S. to get this technology. Its use is now being integrated into UW CT protocols. Image courtesy of Timothy P. Szczykutowicz

Feature | Computed Tomography (CT) | July 12, 2019 | By Greg Freiherr
When providers develop their own imaging protocols, they are wasting time and money, according to...

Image courtesy of GE Healthcare

Feature | Radiology Business | July 03, 2019 | By Jeffrey Hoffmeister, M.D.
Burnout in the medical profession is not uncommon, particularly as clinicians have become more overwhelmed by growing

stock.adobe.com / netsign

Feature | Radiology Business | July 02, 2019 | By William W. Pinsky, M.D., FAAP, FACC, and Mandeep R. Mehra, M.D., MBBS, MSc, FRCP
As we strive to process today’s successive news cycles involving negative reports about immigration, it is easy for m
A 3-D printed model (left) and a model constructed in augmented reality (right), both of a kidney with a tumor. In both models, the kidney is clear; the tumor is visible in purple on the AR model and in white on the 3-D printed model.

A 3-D printed model (left) and a model constructed in augmented reality (right), both of a kidney with a tumor. In both models, the kidney is clear; the tumor is visible in purple on the AR model and in white on the 3-D printed model. Photo courtesy of Nicole Wake, Ph.D.

Feature | Advanced Visualization | July 02, 2019 | By Jeff Zagoudis
Three-dimensional (3-D) printing and...
The Acuson Sequoia with Deep Abdominal Transducer (DAX) scanning a 600 pound patient.

The Acuson Sequoia with Deep Abdominal Transducer (DAX) scanning a 600 pound patient.

Sponsored Content | Case Study | Ultrasound Imaging | July 01, 2019
“With our present technology, we often struggle with large patients,” said Richard G.
David Anderson at SIIM

David Anderson presents information about the development of artificial Intelligence (AI) at SIIM 2019 as his father, Charles, looks on from a front row seat. The father-son team presented information at the SIIM annual meeting about their use of relatively shallow Deep Learning networks to analyze chest radiographs with AI.

Feature | Information Technology | July 01, 2019 | By Greg Freiherr
Two simple neural networks are better than one complex one, according to a father-son team of entrepreneurs.
Philips Pinnacle

Image courtesy of Philips Healthcare

Feature | Treatment Planning | July 01, 2019 | By Jeff Zagoudis