Feature | Enterprise Imaging | October 03, 2017 | By Steve Holloway

Enterprise Imaging to Account for 27 Percent of Imaging Market

This article originally ran as an introduction to the Enterprise Imaging Systems comparison chart in the October 2017 issue. The chart can be viewed here.

Agfa Healthcare enterprise imaging to aid radiology workflow.

Image courtesy of Agfa Healthcare

A battle is raging in imaging IT today. Once a profitable hunting ground for traditional picture archiving and communication system (PACS) firms, new market entrants from the content management, archiving and informatics market are looking to disrupt the status quo. Pushing “deconstruction,” “reconstruction” and “distributed” multi-vendor imaging IT models, they have grabbed the attention of healthcare providers.

However, traditional PACS vendors have also been expanding their offerings, pushing “enterprise imaging” solutions (bundled viewer, workflow, dashboarding and archiving) as an upgrade to their stand-alone PACS offerings. The below offers a summary of the key findings from the new report: “Imaging IT and Archiving and Management IT — World — 2017,” published by Signify Research, to investigate the adoption of new imaging IT models.

 

Enterprise Imaging on the Rise

One of the clearest findings from the report shows that single-vendor, enterprise imaging IT looks set to significantly increase its share of the market. Over the next five years, we forecast enterprise imaging revenue to more than double globally, by far the fastest growing segment in the market. But what is driving this trend and what does it mean for new models offered by non-PACS suppliers?

 

Incumbent Advantage

Traditional PACS vendors have the largest installed base of stand-alone PACS, RIS and CVIS software in the market today. This is a clear advantage as healthcare providers see many positives from upgrading their departmental solution to enterprise imaging, including: perceived speed and lower expense of implementation with same vendor; less training required for staff and clinical disruption with similar user interface and system; perceived lower IT administration and professional service; single platform approach is perceived to aid workflow efficiency;  relatively broad clinical coverage and capability; and easier to work with single vendor (“one throat to choke”).

Additionally, the core strengths of enterprise imaging solutions fit the needs of the largest addressable market segment, the mid-size hospital. Combined with many providers in the large and small hospital segment, these customers form the core of the traditional PACS vendor installed base. Today there is far greater focus on efficiency, workflow and speed of implementation given the current pressures on healthcare funding in this sector.  With a single vendor enterprise imaging platform, it is perceived that these core needs can be better addressed than with a multi-vendor, best-of-breed model.

For best-of-breed vendors pushing a deconstructed multi-vendor model, this limits their addressable market. Best-of-breed clinical specialists increasingly find themselves pushed out of most enterprise deals today, especially with an incumbent PACS vendor. Their mainstay opportunities instead are academic providers willing to accept the longer and more expensive implementation required with multi-vendor deconstructed models, though these tend to be less frequent in comparison.

 

Changing Provider Power Base

A change in decision-making power within health provider procurement is also impacting the way that imaging IT strategy is decided, especially in North America. Centralization of IT administration as provider networks have expanded created a new powerbase for procurement. Archiving and management vendors have been quick to exploit this in the largest networks. Vendor neutral archives (VNAs) and independent clinical archives (ICAs) from specialist vendors are more advanced in capability in most instances. These can connect different departmental imaging IT systems to centralize image management and storage at far lower cost than a complete replacement of all imaging IT.

Following this success, archiving and management vendors are also eyeing the clinical realm, developing their own clinical modules for viewing, workflow, clinical review and even diagnostic capabilities. By using their foundation of the application content layer in a health provider’s stack, they are trying to push into front line clinical and diagnostic use. Moreover, they are looking to use the power of the CIO in enterprise provider IT procurement as leverage to adopting their solutions.

 

Clinical Breadth Still Important

However, clinical and diagnostic capability is the mainstay of traditional PACS vendors, with decades of clinical expertise in diagnostics and a breadth of tools in many clinical applications. Our research with industry vendors from across all product types has highlighted that for many providers, clinical breadth of solution remains a major factor in decision-making. This has so far limited independent archiving and management firms from any real success with their clinical or diagnostic capabilities, as most have far less clinical breadth than traditional PACS firms. Moreover, many traditional PACS vendors have now developed or acquired archiving and management capability for their enterprise imaging products. By doing so, this removes the need for standalone solutions from non-PACS competitors, especially in the mid and small provider segments where advanced imaging management and archiving capability is less important.

 

The Bigger Picture

When considered in the wider market context, enterprise imaging from the largest PACS vendors has a further advantage, often overlooked. Healthcare budgets are being squeezed and this is forcing a change in procurement, especially towards bundling of hardware and services in long-term managed service contracts. Most of the major PACS vendors are also imaging modality vendors, as well as offering a host of other clinical hardware and software across the clinical sector. In bundling their portfolio together with their enterprise imaging IT solutions, they can offer advantages from a cost perspective. These deals tend to be more aggressive on pricing, especially as long-term deals become more common, as they “lock-in” customers and with it, future revenue. Consolidation to a single vendor in this way is also perceived by providers to offer greater benefits in maintenance, support and integration.

For many providers, the perceived positives offer the best mid-term solution to meet their cost and efficiency goals, while limiting disruption. The single vendor enterprise imaging approach may lead to future challenges with regards to interoperability and content management of images and data down the line, especially when dealing with unstructured content or complex information exchange between providers. While this remains to be seen and further evolution of imaging IT models should be expected, it looks like enterprise imaging will be winning the lion’s share of revenues in the near and mid-term future.

Steve Holloway with the U.K.-based healthcare market intelligence firm Signify Research.

 

Related Enterprise Imaging Content:

RSNA Technology Report 2017: Enterprise Imaging

VIDEO: Technology Report: Enterprise Imaging 2017

VIDEO: Building An Effective Enterprise Imaging Strategy

Five Steps for Better Diagnostic Image Management

VIDEO: Enterprise Imaging and the Digital Imaging Adoption Model

VIDEO: Defining Enterprise Imaging — The HIMSS-SIIM Enterprise Imaging Workgroup

VIDEO: How to Build An Enterprise Imaging System

Related Content

DR 800 multi-purpose digital imaging system with Dynamic Musica
News | Digital Radiography (DR) | July 20, 2018
Agfa displayed the new DR 800 multi-purpose digital imaging system with Dynamic ...
Fujifilm to Host Pediatric Imaging Best Practices Symposium at AHRA 2018
News | Pediatric Imaging | July 18, 2018
Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A. Inc. announced that it will offer educational opportunities and exhibit its latest...
Study Points to Need for Performance Standards for EHR Usability and Safety
News | Electronic Medical Records (EMR) | July 18, 2018
A novel new study provides compelling evidence that the design, development and implementation of electronic health...
Guerbet, IBM Watson Health Partner on Artificial Intelligence for Liver Imaging
News | Clinical Decision Support | July 10, 2018
Guerbet announced it has signed an exclusive joint development agreement with IBM Watson Health to develop an...
Developing a “cloud-first” strategy has helped with efficiency and cost savings
Feature | Archive Cloud Storage | July 05, 2018 | By Greg Freiherr
The need to protect patient images and other clinical data from disasters is increasing, just as doing so is getting...
FDA Clears Bay Labs' EchoMD AutoEF Software for AI Echo Analysis
Technology | Cardiovascular Ultrasound | June 19, 2018
Cardiovascular imaging artificial intelligence (AI) company Bay Labs announced its EchoMD AutoEF software received 510(...
News | Remote Viewing Systems | June 14, 2018
International Medical Solutions (IMS) recently announced that the American College of Radiology (ACR) added IMS'...
Wake Radiology Launches First Installation of EnvoyAI Platform
News | Artificial Intelligence | June 13, 2018
Artificial intelligence (AI) platform provider EnvoyAI recently completed their first successful customer installation...
How AI and Deep Learning Will Enable Cancer Diagnosis Via Ultrasound

The red outline shows the manually segmented boundary of a carcinoma, while the deep learning-predicted boundaries are shown in blue, green and cyan. Copyright 2018 Kumar et al. under Creative Commons Attribution License.

News | Ultrasound Imaging | June 12, 2018 | Tony Kontzer
June 12, 2018 — Viksit Kumar didn’t know his mother had...
Zebra Medical Vision Unveils AI-Based Chest X-ray Research
News | Artificial Intelligence | June 08, 2018
June 8, 2018 — Zebra Medical Vision unveiled its Textray chest X-ray research, which will form the basis for a future
Overlay Init