Feature | April 01, 2015 | Jim Calandra

The Benefits of Molecular Breast Imaging vs. Mammography in Dense Breasts

Women with dense breasts must be educated on the available options for secondary screening techniques, including molecular breast imaging (MBI)

A comparison between mammography vs. molecular breast imaging (MBI).

A side-by-side comparison of mammography vs. molecular breast imaging.

A comparison of breast cancer seen on mammography vs. molecular breast imaging (MBI).

Image courtesy of Mayo Clinic

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths among women in developed countries.[1] It is estimated that about 12 percent of women in the United States will develop invasive breast cancer over the course of their lifetime and more than 200,000 new cases of invasive breast cancer are expected to be diagnosed in 2015.[2] It is important to know the risks and warning signs of breast cancer, and having the benefit of early detection is invaluable, but sometimes that’s easier said than done.

Typically, women have routine mammograms to screen for breast cancer every one to two years. However, having dense breasts, which affects up to 40 percent of women in the United States, can cause complexities in detecting cancer through these routine mammogram screenings. Dense breast tissue causes images to appear white, the same color a potential tumor would be, and this masking can cause results to come back inconclusive. Unfortunately, because cancerous tumors aren’t initially picked up in screening, this can lead to the belief of being cancer-free. Research has shown that women who have dense breast tissue may also be more likely to develop cancer. A recent online article “What It Means to Have ‘Dense Breasts’ and Why It Matters”[3] said, “One of the biggest issues with current screening protocols is that the younger a woman is, the harder it is to tell if she has cancer because her breasts are denser.” Half of women under the age of 50 have dense breasts, while one-third of women over 50 do. The article reiterates that “Denser breasts not only make it harder to detect cancers, they are also linked to an increased risk of developing cancer in the first place.” 

To increase awareness of dense breast tissue, there are currently 21 states that have enacted the breast density notification law,[4] requiring doctors to inform patients of dense breast tissue. Though this helps to educate women, the challenge of screening for breast cancer with this condition still remains, as traditional mammography screenings may not detect cancers in women with dense breast tissue and widespread adoption of secondary screening options is only now starting to become more common.

MBI Shows Positive Results

A new technique, molecular breast imaging (MBI), has shown positive results as an adjunct method to the traditional mammogram, especially in women with dense breasts. MBI uses a short-lived radiotracer, injected into the arm of a patient, which is attracted to any areas of cancer inside the breast. This form of imaging is able to see through tissue density and highlight tumors that are not always detected in mammography images.

When paired with mammography screening, MBI plays a significant role in detecting cancers in women with dense breasts. In the past, many studies have investigated the use of MBI as a secondary screening technique to mammography, to which researchers have noted the necessity for lower dose imaging technology needed before MBI could be broadly accepted for screening. A recent Mayo Clinic study, “Molecular Breast Imaging at Reduced Radiation Dose for Supplemental Screening in Mammographically Dense Breasts,”[5] published in the American Journal of Roentgenology, further investigates this topic and addresses the question of MBI performance at a lower dose. The study confirms that the use of MBI not only provides better imaging, but at low radiation exposure for women with dense breast tissue. This study confirms that when added as a secondary technique to mammography, MBI screening quadrupled the cancer detection rate for invasive cancer. 

Other Supplemental Screening Tools

Other techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound, have also been discussed as alternative supplemental screening tools for women with dense breast tissue. However, both have been criticized because of the number of false positives that lead to unnecessary biopsies. In addition, MRI is complex and expensive for both the equipment and procedure, and ultrasounds only detect a small fraction of cancers in secondary screening at an increased cost. MBI has proven to be a more effective option for secondary screening because of its high sensitivity and high specificity, which lead to significantly more cancer detection with higher true positive biopsies.

As awareness continues to spread around the risks of breast cancer in women with dense breast tissue and the notification act gains traction at the state and federal level, it is important to continue educating women about dense breast tissue and the potential risks related to breast cancer. As important as educating women about the risks of dense breasts is, it is equally important for women to know the available options for secondary screening techniques when they are notified that they have dense breasts. As MBI continues to prove itself as a beneficial screening method at both a low radiation dose and low cost, this technique will truly help save lives through earlier breast cancer detection.

Read the related article "Pros and Cons of Molecular Breast Imaging Tools."




1. http://time.com/3694662/lung-cancer-breast-cancer/, accessed Feb. 24, 2015.

2. www.cancer.org/cancer/breastcancer/detailedguide/breast-cancer-key-statistics, accessed Feb. 24, 2015.

3. www.yahoo.com/health/what-it-means-to-have-dense-breasts-and-why-it-105535296837.html, accessed Feb. 24, 2015.

4. www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/s2622, accessed Feb. 24, 2015.

5. www.ajronline.org/doi/abs/10.2214/AJR.14.13357, accessed
Feb. 24, 2015.

Jim Calandra is president and CEO of Gamma Medica. He has more than 20 years of management experience in the healthcare industry as an officer and director of several healthcare companies. Prior to joining Gamma Medica, he was a founding partner of Birch Hill Partners LLC, a management consulting firm specializing in advising private equity portfolio companies.

Related Content

GE Healthcare Recalls Millennium Nuclear Medicine Systems
News | Nuclear Imaging | November 15, 2018
GE Healthcare announced it is recalling its Millennium Nuclear Medicine Systems due to an incident in which the the top...
MEDraysintell Projects Increasing Mergers and Acquisitions in Nuclear Medicine
News | Nuclear Imaging | November 07, 2018
With the recent announcement by Novartis to acquire Endocyte , interest from the conventional pharmaceutical industry...
The Siemens Biograph Vision PET-CT system was released in mid-2018.

The Siemens Biograph Vision PET-CT system was released in mid-2018.

Feature | Nuclear Imaging | September 07, 2018 | By Dave Fornell
Nuclear imaging technology for both single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography...
Abnormal Protein Concentrations Found in Brains of Military Personnel With Suspected CTE

Researchers are using the tracer, which is injected into a patient, then seen with a PET scan, to see if it is possible to diagnose chronic traumatic encephalopathy in living patients. In this image, warmer colors indicate a higher concentration of the tracer, which binds to abnormal proteins in the brain. Credit UCLA Health.

News | PET Imaging | August 24, 2018
August 24, 2018 — In a small study of
Siemens Healthineers Announces FDA Clearance of syngo.via VB30 Molecular Imaging Software
Technology | Nuclear Imaging | July 16, 2018
At the 2018 Annual Meeting of the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), June 23-26 in Philadelphia...
Nuclear imaging scan showing very good tissue delineation. Scan performed on a Biograph Vision positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET-CT) system from Siemens Healthineers.

Nuclear imaging scan showing very good tissue delineation. It offers crisp overall image quality and sharply delineates the muscle and fat planes, vertebral margins and end plates, billiary radicals, renal calyces, aortic wall and papillary muscles of the heart. Scan performed on a Biograph Vision positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET-CT) system from Siemens Healthineers.

Technology | PET-CT | June 05, 2018
June 5, 2018 — The U.S.
The Chalk River nuclear reactor license has been renewed, but will be decommissioned by 2028.

The Chalk River nuclear isotope reactor license has been renewed, but will be decommissioned by 2028. The reactor supplies about 50 percent of the world's supply of Tc99m.

Feature | Nuclear Imaging | April 02, 2018 | Dave Fornell
April 2, 2018 – The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) announced March 29 that it renewed Canadian Nuclear Lab
A Tc99m SPECT cardiac exam showing myocardial perfusion in the heart.

Technetium-99m is primarily used for the detection of cancer and to assess perfusion defects in the heart caused by heart attacks or other conditions.

Feature | Radiopharmaceuticals and Tracers | February 08, 2018 | Dave Fornell
February 8, 2018 — The U.S.
Netherlands Cancer Institute Exploring Molecular Imaging Technology for Prostate Cancer Surgery
News | Molecular Imaging | October 26, 2017
The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI) announced it has received funding from the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF...
Combined Optical and Molecular Imaging Could Guide Breast-Conserving Surgery

WLE specimen from a patient with a grade 3, ER-/HER2-, no special type (NST) carcinoma. (A) Cerenkov image; (B) Grey-scale photographic image overlaid with Cerenkov signal. An increased signal from the tumor is visible (white arrows); mean radiance is 871 ± 131 photons/s/cm2/sr, mean TBR is 3.22. Both surgeons measured the posterior margin (outlined in blue) as 2 mm (small arrow); a cavity shaving would have been performed if the image had been available intraoperatively. The medial margin (outlined in green) measured >5 mm by both surgeons. Pathology ink prevented assessing the lateral margin; a phosphorescent signal is visible (open arrows). (C) Specimen radiography image. The absence of one surgical clip to mark the anterior margin, and the odd position of the superior margin clip (white arrow) prevented reliable margin assessment. (D) Combined histopathology image from two adjacent pathology slides on which the posterior margin (bottom of image) and part of the primary tumor are visible (open arrows). The distance from the posterior margin measured 3 mm microscopically (double arrow). The medial margin is > 5 mm (not present in image). Credit: A. D. Purushotham, M.D., King’s College London, UK

News | Nuclear Imaging | June 20, 2017
June 20, 2017 — Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is the primary treatment for early-stage...