Feature | Radiology Business | May 05, 2021 | By Jef Williams

When working with a vendor on a new project, it is critical to focus on the actual execution of the implementation

When working with a vendor on project implementation, it is critical to focus on the actual execution of the implementation

Getty Images


You have selected a vendor. Congratulations. Most likely you conducted a formal selection process or perhaps a request for proposal (RFP). Now you have identified a vendor of choice. If you are diligent in your work, you have conducted a very careful contracting phase that has dissected the verbiage in your contract line-by-line to safeguard your organization from failure. You have also put in safeguards to ensure the vendor will be held accountable for milestones and timelines, and perhaps even resource accessibility. While prudent, all too often everything done to this point has minimal impact on the actual execution of the implementation.

In my career I have participated in more than 100 project implementations and these are the things I think every buyer/provider should know and execute upon.

1. Do not kick-off a project until you have a project plan with resources assigned.

Vendors love to kick-off projects. It typically means revenue — so they are motivated to get the project going. The problem is their resources are allocated across multiple conflicting projects. As a result, buy-in from key vendor resources is absent at project kick-off. In addition, your vendor is burning project fuel post kick-off requesting resources and building a project plan that should be
75 percent boilerplate. You are expending internal resources, typically for months, waiting on your vendor when project work should start week 2 after the project kick-off. As well, you are losing the faith of your team while they observe very limited project activity. This is a terrible way to start an important project.

2. Expand your design phase by a multiple of 2 and require vendor engineering engagement.

There is a good possibility your vendor used creative wordplay regarding their capabilities in your RFP. You have no idea where those gaps lie until you vet the entire design of the solution within the context of the implementation. Some vendors spend very little time on design during the RFP, or even kick-off phase. This works to your disadvantage and will negatively impact your implementation and success. Your project requires sufficient design which means whiteboarding sessions, workflow and dataflow diagrams, interface specifications, and desktop requirements and architecture details outlined. Any assumptions on your part will be your undoing. 

3. Ensure your escalation path goes to the very top — quickly.

Vendors will provide escalation paths. Most lead to an account manager who has limited organizational authority. Your escalation path should lead, nearly directly, to someone with the authority to bind the company. If they are in the sales org-chart, you lose. You will, undoubtedly, escalate many times within the horizon of your project and if it leads to the wrong resource, you could lose weeks or months in delays. 

4. Cancel any call that does not have the right resource allocated — or an agenda.

Every time your vendor attends a call without subject matter experts appropriate to the call agenda it is costing you in resources and project timeline. The telephone game is cute when you are in first grade, but when there are millions of dollars and, more importantly, improvements to your patient outcomes on the line, this is unacceptable. Get an agenda and a list of attendees before every call and if the right person is not in attendance within
5 minutes reschedule the call. Then escalate.

5. Plan for 25 percent cost overage — minimum.

Most vendors do not plan for contingencies. They bill for them. No matter how good your contract language is, your vendor will stumble upon functional requirements that were not clearly specified in the RFP and contract. You will get billed for this work. Budget for it or go back to the well. Your choice.

6. Refuse to move your go-live.

Go-live dates are always negotiable with vendors. Prepare to negotiate to get the resources allocated. Book the right people at a minimum four months in advance to ensure you are not left with a deficiency on your vendor’s team during your go-live.

7. Do not pay for service and support until you are live.

You have entered a long-term support contract that will provide years of annuity revenue to your vendor. This is fair. But avoid any hard dates for support prior to going live — until that point your interaction and costs should be associated solely with the implementation team that was quoted in your selection process.

8. Always be ready to start over with Vendor B.

Here is the hardest one of all, but is critical. I have seen many clients stick with a vendor that has been untruthful, unaccountable, disingenuous, unable to deliver and implementing a subpar solution that looks nothing like the product and service they sold in the RFP. The issue is always money and delivery. The cost of starting over seems too expensive. And the burning platform motivating the move to a new solution is too urgent. But the cost of staying with a difficult or unmanageable technology partner will ultimately cost you more.

Jef Williams is managing partner for Paragon Consulting Partners LLC, a Sacramento, Calif., based healthcare IT consulting group.

 

You can find additional radiology business information here. 


Related Content

News | Breast Imaging

Feb. 16, 2026 — Rising demand for breast cancer screening and diagnostics is outpacing the supply of available breast ...

Time February 17, 2026
arrow
Feature | Artificial Intelligence

For the past decade, artificial intelligence's (AI) potential in healthcare has been synonymous with speed. In medical ...

Time February 16, 2026
arrow
News | ARRS

Feb. 11, 2026 —The American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS) has announced the following radiologists, as well as their ...

Time February 13, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Business

Feb. 3, 2026 — RadNet, Inc., a provider of high-quality, cost-effective outpatient diagnostic imaging services and ...

Time February 12, 2026
arrow
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Feb. 6, 2026 — A state-of-the-art intraoperative MRI (iMRI) has arrived at the University of Chicago Medicine, one of ...

Time February 06, 2026
arrow
News | Computed Tomography (CT)

Feb. 4, 2026 — A new review published in the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) finds that advances in CT ...

Time February 04, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Imaging

Feb. 4, 2026 — The Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) has issued its initial reaction to the British government's ...

Time February 04, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Education

Jan. 22, 2026—The American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS) will host a live virtual symposium, "Medical Imaging for ...

Time January 28, 2026
arrow
News | Computed Tomography (CT)

Jan. 21, 2026 — Aidoc recently announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cleared the industry's first ...

Time January 23, 2026
arrow
News | Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS)

Jan. 22, 2026 — Qure.ai has received a grant from the Gates Foundation to develop a large open-source multi-modal ...

Time January 23, 2026
arrow
Subscribe Now