The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has withdrawn guidance  on specific parts of the independent dispute resolution (IDR) process for provider-insurer out-of-network care payment disputes in the agency’s Surprise Billing Interim Final Rule. CMS took the action following a Feb. 23 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruling to vacate parts of the rule — as asked for in a suit filed by the Texas Medical Association.

March 8, 2022 — The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has withdrawn guidance  on specific parts of the independent dispute resolution (IDR) process for provider-insurer out-of-network care payment disputes in the agency’s Surprise Billing Interim Final Rule. CMS took the action following a Feb. 23 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruling to vacate parts of the rule — as asked for in a suit filed by the Texas Medical Association.

In its announcement, CMS pledged to: repost this guidance once it has been revised to conform with the court’s decision; provide training on the new guidance for arbitrators, providers and insurers; and open the independent dispute resolution portal for dispute submissions.

The federal government has until April 24 to appeal the Texas ruling that the IDR provisions violated the Administrative Procedure Act. If the federal government does not appeal that ruling, federal agencies will be required to revise the sections of the rule to bring them into compliance with the court’s decision.

Similar concerns relating to the IDR process led the American College of Radiology (ACR), American College of Emergency Physicians and American Society of Anesthesiologists to file suit in the U.S. District Court for Northern Illinois. The groups recently filed a motion for summary judgement asking the court to block this part of the rule from being implemented.

Four similar suits have been filed. It is unclear what — if anything — CMS’ move to withdraw guidance may mean regarding the government’s intent to appeal the Texas suit or pursue the other suits. The Texas federal court ruling, the ACR lawsuit and the four other federal cases do not in any way affect the No Surprises Act patient protections or patient out-of-pocket costs.

The ACR will continue to post updates about this important matter. More information about the ACR, ACEP and ASA lawsuit is on the College’s website.

Related content:

ACR Joins "No Surprises Act" Lawsuit to Protect Patient Care

Major Medical Associations Ask Federal Court for Summary Judgement in No Surprises Lawsuit


Related Content

News | X-Ray

Aug. 10, 2026 — Teledyne Technologies Inc. and Varex Imaging Corp. have jointly announced that they have entered into a ...

Time August 14, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Imaging

Aug. 4, 2026 — A new study from the Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute found that the time between an imaging scan ...

Time August 06, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Imaging

July 30, 2026 — João Seabra, head of Siemens Healthineers Enterprise Services, has been appointed president and Head of ...

Time August 06, 2026
arrow
News | Innovative Hospitals

July 27, 2026 — Vanderbilt Health and Siemens Healthineers have entered into a multi-year, $87 million Value ...

Time July 28, 2026
arrow
News | RSNA

July 15, 2026 — The Radiological Society of North America has announced its lineup of plenary speaker for RSNA 2026 ...

Time July 21, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Imaging

July 20, 2026 — Bracco Imaging has earned the 2026 EcoVadis Platinum Medal, the highest level of recognition awarded by ...

Time July 21, 2026
arrow
News | ACR

July 15, 2026 — The American College of Radiology (ACR) recently issued a statement praising the inclusion of the ...

Time July 16, 2026
arrow
News | Ultrasound Imaging

July 13, 2026 — Neal F. Kassell, MD, founder and chairman of the Focused Ultrasound Foundation, received the inaugural ...

Time July 13, 2026
arrow
News | Radiation Oncology

July 10, 2026 — A new study led by researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai found that although the ...

Time July 10, 2026
arrow
News | Interventional Radiology

June 25, 2026 — Radiologists performing no interventional radiology-related (IR-related) work increased from one-third ...

Time June 25, 2026
arrow
Subscribe Now