Clinical Trial Acute Back Pain Imaging

October 3, 2012 — According to an article in the October issue of the Journal of the American College of Radiology, radiologists at Emory University Hospital, in Atlanta, and Georgia Health Sciences University, in Augusta, Ga., have developed evidence-based guidelines to assist physicians with the process of managing patients with acute low back pain. Low back pain is one of the most common reasons for visits to physicians in the outpatient setting.

“The approach to the workup and management of low back pain by physicians and other practitioners is inconstant. In fact, there is significant variability in the diagnostic workup of back pain among physicians within and between specialties,” said Scott E. Forseen, M.D., co-author of the article.

The following process was developed to assist practitioners with the management of patients with low back pain:

At the initial visit, patients are categorized into one of three groups after a thorough history and physical examination: non-specific low back pain, low back pain potentially associated with radiculopathy or spinal stenosis, or low back pain potentially associated with a specific cause. Evidence-based order sets, that are intended to guide practitioners through the process of evaluation, management and follow-up of patients, are provided for each category.

Order set templates for use at the initial follow-up visit (four weeks) provide evidence-based recommendations for appropriate imaging, laboratory workup, referral for invasive procedures or surgical consultation.

“We have presented a logical method of choosing, developing and implementing clinical decision support interventions that is based on the best available evidence. These templates may be reasonably expected to improve patient care, decrease inappropriate imaging utilization, reduce the inappropriate use of steroids and narcotics and potentially decrease the number of inappropriate invasive procedures,” said Forseen.

For additional information: www.acr.org


Related Content

News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

September 28, 2023 — Siemens Healthineers has announced the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance of the Magnetom ...

Time September 28, 2023
arrow
News | Breast Imaging

September 27, 2023 — Researchers at Weill Cornell Medicine have discovered that radiation therapy combined with two ...

Time September 27, 2023
arrow
News | Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS)

September 26, 2023 — Exo (pronounced “echo”), a medical imaging software and device company, today unveiled a category ...

Time September 26, 2023
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

September 25, 2023 — Viz.ai, a leader in AI-powered disease detection and intelligent care coordination, today announced ...

Time September 25, 2023
arrow
Feature | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | By Robert L. Bard, MD, and Lennard M. Gettz, EdD

Since the advent of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exam on human patients in the late 1970s, this innovation ...

Time September 25, 2023
arrow
News | Cardiac Imaging

September 21, 2023 — Declines in cardiovascular procedure volumes observed early in the COVID-19 pandemic greatly ...

Time September 21, 2023
arrow
News | X-Ray

September 21, 2023 — Scientists in Moscow have successfully engineered a prototype detector for X-ray and PET/CT ...

Time September 21, 2023
arrow
News | Enterprise Imaging

September 20, 2023 — aycan, a recognized leader in medical imaging, announced today a new solution for reviewing DICOM ...

Time September 20, 2023
arrow
Feature | Radiation Dose Management | By Melinda Taschetta-Millane

Early-stage detection is key to the prevention of life-threatening diseases; however, limited access to data hinders the ...

Time September 20, 2023
arrow
Feature | Ultrasound Imaging | By Mustafa Hassan, PhD

Handheld ultrasound has not yet reached mainstream adoption, but the market is still forecast to reach over $500 million ...

Time September 20, 2023
arrow
Subscribe Now