News | MRI Breast | February 19, 2016

New MRI Analytics May Offer Quick Breast Cancer Treatment Guidance

Faster, cheaper test predicts who needs chemotherapy or just hormonal regimen

breast MRI, ER-positive breast cancer detection, Case Western Reserve study

Differences in dynamic textural patterns are apparent between a patient with a low recurrence score, left, and a patient with a high recurrence score, right. Image courtesy of Nature Scientific Reports

February 19, 2016 — A new way to analyze magnetic resonance images (MRI) data appears to reliably distinguish between patients who would need only hormonal treatment and those who also need chemotherapy, researchers from Case Western Reserve University report.

The analysis may provide women diagnosed with estrogen positive-receptor (ER-positive) breast cancer —the most common type of breast cancer — answers far faster than current tests and, due to its expected low cost, open the door to this kind of testing worldwide.

The research is published in the journal Nature Scientific Reports.

“In the United States, nearly 70 percent of all breast cancer patients are diagnosed with ER-positive, but the majority don’t need chemotherapy,” said Anant Madabhushi, biomedical engineering professor at Case Western Reserve and research leader.

“Until about 15 years ago, doctors had no way of telling aggressive cancer from non-aggressive, so the majority of women got chemotherapy, which can produce very harsh side effects,” he said.

Since then, a genomic test for differentiating between aggressive and nonaggressive cancer was developed. The test requires doctors to send a biopsy sample to a company that analyzes it and assigns a risk score that the doctors then use to guide treatment.

“The test is used frequently in the United States, but it destroys tissue, requires shipping and costs about $4,000,” said Madabhushi, who is a member of the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center. “The cost puts the test out of reach for people in middle- and low-income countries.”

Madabhushi’s team, which employs big data to study disease, thought they might find useful signals to discern aggressive ER-positive from indolent by mining radiologic data from MRIs.

They analyzed images of 96 ER-positive cancer patients scanned at a hospital in Cleveland or Boston. Each woman had undergone what’s called a dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, which produces images of tissues as they take up a contrast agent. Each woman had also undergone the genomic test.

Because intensity values regularly used to analyze tissues vary by scanner, the researchers needed a different way to search for signals distinguishing the two categories of patients:

  • They discovered differences in gene expression—molecular changes that appeared as changes in textural patterns in the images; and
  • They converted the dynamic texture changes into quantitative measurements and used differences in the measurements to determine which patients needed chemotherapy and which did not.

In 85 percent of the cases, the conclusions matched those of the genomic test.

“We think the dynamic texture data is robust and reliable,” Madabhushi said. “It allows us to compare apples to apples.”

He expects the test, if further trials validate it, would cost “pennies on the dollar, compared to the $4,000 test.”

For the patient, the test requires an MRI scan, which many doctors already prescribe for those newly diagnosed with cancer. “So the test, for many, doesn’t require the cost of a scan,” Madabhushi said.

He said a computer and program are the tools needed. No tissue would be shipped. Instead of waiting a week or two for results, the wait would be minutes, reducing the stress on patients and allowing them to quickly start treatment, the researchers say.

“With cloud computing and data warehousing, we can analyze images coming in from anywhere in the world, “Madabhushi said. “It breaks down geographic boundaries because everything is electronically transmitted.”

The researchers are seeking funding to evaluate the test further. They want to look at the outcomes for the 96 patients to try to determine how accurately this test and the genomic test predicted who needed chemotherapy and who didn’t. They plan to test scans from more sites to see if the results hold up.

Madabhushi said even if the MRI test proves to make accurate predictions only for patients at extremely low or extremely high need for chemotherapy, the analysis would still serve 30 to 40 percent of patients.

Co-authors on this paper include Tao Wan, Ph.D., professor of school of biological sciences and medical engineering at Beihang University; Boston Medical Center’s B. Nicholas Bloch, M.D., associate professor of radiology, and Carl Jaffe, M.D., professor of radiology; and from Case Western Reserve, Hannah Gilmore, M.D., assistant professor of pathology, Cheryl Thompson, Ph.D., assistant professor of biostatistics and epidemiology, Donna Plecha, M.D., associate professor of radiology, and Lyndsay Harris, M.D., professor of hematology and oncology.

For more information: www.nature.com/srep

Related Content

Explaining the Mammography Quality Standards Act
Feature | Mammography | October 16, 2018
The Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) was enacted to improve the quality of mammography and ensure that all...
CT Offers Non-Invasive Alternative for Complex Coronary Disease Treatment Planning
News | CT Angiography (CTA) | October 16, 2018
A new study published in the European Heart Journal shows computed tomography (CT) can be a useful aid in heart team...

Images from computed tomography (CT) colonography show segmented abdominal aortic calcification measured with semiautomated CT tool on coronal image. Within region of interest over aorta selected by user, tool automatically segments and quantifies aortic calcification (shown in blue). 

Image Credit: O’Connor S D, Graffy P M, Zea R, et al. Does nonenhanced CT-based quantification of abdominal aortic calcification outperform the Framingham Risk Score in predicting cardiovascular event sin asymptomatic adults? Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180562. Published online Oct. 2, 2018. © RSNA.

News | Computed Tomography (CT) | October 12, 2018
Computed tomography (CT)-based measures of calcification in the abdominal aorta are strong predictors of heart attacks...
iCAD Announces Positive Clinical Results for Artificial Intelligence Tomosynthesis Technology
News | Mammography | October 11, 2018
iCAD Inc. announced positive clinical results of its new digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) cancer detection software,...
"Where's My Mammogram?" Campaign Helps Women Own Breast Health Records
News | Breast Imaging | October 10, 2018
October 10, 2018 — Mammosphere launched “Where’s My Mammogram?,” a public service campaign to help women obtain copie
DenseBreast-info.org Launches European Expansion
News | Breast Density | October 10, 2018
DenseBreast-info.org (DB-I) announced the launch of its international expansion for European medical providers. The...
Surgery, Radiation Therapy Equally Effective in Treating Oropharyngeal Cancer
News | Radiation Therapy | October 09, 2018
A new study by researchers at UT Southwestern Medical Center found no major long-term differences in the effectiveness...
X-ray Mammography Adoption to Skyrocket for Breast Cancer Detection
News | Mammography | October 08, 2018
Highly populated countries have traditionally been slow adopters of non-conventional business models, but a new Frost...
Cullman Regional Medical Center

Cullman Regional Medical Center (Alabama) is a 145-bed medical center serving more than 175,000 residents in a six-county area and recognized as one of the region’s finest medical facilities.

Sponsored Content | Case Study | PACS | October 05, 2018
When Cullman Regional Medical Center in Alabama decided to switch from 2-D