News | May 24, 2010

Iso-Osmolar Agent Could Save Hospitals Money

Cost per 100 patients for each contrast agent.

May 24, 2010 - Utilizing the iso-osmolar agent Visipaque (iodixanol) could save hospitals $54,617 per 100 patients when compared to the low osmolar nonionic agent iopamidol. This was according to results from a study presented at the American Heart Association’s Quality of Care and Outcomes Research in Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke Scientific Sessions in Washington, D.C., held May 19-21.

James Spalding, M.D., conveyed findings on a study designed to assess the resource utilization and cost of major adversce cardiac events (MACE) during cardiac catheterizations (CC) or percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) among high- and low-risk patients.

The observational, retrospective, cohort study, "Resource Utilization and Economic Impact of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) in Individuals Undergoing Invasive Cardiac Catheterization Procedures (CCP) with Low or Iso-Osmolar Contrast Agents," used data available from Jan. 1, 2007 through Dec. 31, 2008 from 600 U.S. acute care hospitals.

Researchers observed patients older than age 18, undergoing CC or PCI in the outpatient hospital setting and who received a contrast agent (iohexol, iodixanol, ioversol, iopamidol, or ioxaglate) on the same day as the procedure were included in the analysis. Patients received more than one contrast agent on the day of the procedure were excluded. High-risk patients were defined as having acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or angina at initial admission.

They assessed the following outcome measures among high- and low-risk patients:

- The presence of MACE based on a primary diagnosis ICD-9 code for AMI (410.xx), other forms of ischemic heart disease (411.xx, 414.xx), or angina (413.xx) within 30 days of initial CC/PCI.
- The length of stay (LOS) of initial visit.
- Costs that were calculated from the hospital perspective.

The found the following outcomes:
- Among the 521,437 patients undergoing a CC/PCI, 2.5 percent (n=13,149) experienced a MACE; high-risk patients had a higher rate of MACE compared to low-risk patients (4.1 vs. 2.1 percent, P - For those experiencing MACE, high-risk patients had longer overall LOS (4.2 vs. 3.3 days, P - For MACE patients, those who were at high risk had greater total costs during the initial visit and 30 days post-visit.

After applying literature-based rates, the researchers concluded the iso-osmolar agent Visipaque (iodixanol) could save hospitals $54,617 per 100 patients when compared to the low osmolar nonionic agent iopamidol. Similarly, utilization of the iso-osmolar agent Visipaque (iodixanol) in high-risk patients may save up to $61,582 per 100 patients when compared to the low osmolar ionic agent ioxaglate.

Furthermore, the study concluded:

- MACE is a complication in CC and PCI with substantial resource utilization and costs.

- The iso-osmolar contrast agent Visipaque (iodixanol) may reduce the rate of MACE versus iopamidol and versus ioxaglate in high-risk patients.

- The cost difference for resource utilization associated with CC and PCI shown by this analysis for iodixanol vs. ioxaglate is approximately $61,000 and for iodixanol versus iopamidol is approximately $55,000.

For more information: www.gehealthcare.com

Related Content

Guerbet, IBM Watson Health Partner on Artificial Intelligence for Liver Imaging
News | Clinical Decision Support | July 10, 2018
Guerbet announced it has signed an exclusive joint development agreement with IBM Watson Health to develop an...
Imaging agent helps predict success of lung cancer therapy
News | Oncology Diagnostics | March 08, 2018
March 8, 2018 – Doctors contemplating the best therapy for...
OptiStar Elite injector
Feature | Contrast Media Injectors | March 07, 2018 | Grand View Research Inc.
The global contrast media injectors market is expected to reach $1.4 billion by 2025, growing at a compound annual...
TriHealth in Cincinnati

TriHealth in Cincinnati.

Sponsored Content | Case Study | Contrast Media Injectors | March 06, 2018
The continuing search for advantages to improve workflow has radiology departments constantly searching for new...
Guerbet Presents Contrast&Care Injection Management Solution at ECR 2018
News | Contrast Media | February 28, 2018
February 28, 2018 — Guerbet will present its new Contrast&Care application, as well as other...
A brain MRI. Gadolinium contrast agents (GBCAs) are partly retained in the brain, raising safety concerns. Gadolinium deposition in the brain has raised concerns about Gadolinium toxicity.

Gadolinium contrast agents (GBCAs) are partly retained in the brain, raising safety concerns, as seen in this MRI.

Feature | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | February 16, 2018 | Dave Fornell
One of the biggest concerns in radiology in recent years is the safety of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) us
ACR Introduces New Contrast Reaction Card
News | Contrast Media | February 07, 2018
The American College of Radiology (ACR) introduced a new contrast reaction card that summarizes important steps to be...
Bracco Diagnostics' MultiHance Contrast Agent Earns Expanded Approval for Pediatric MRI
News | Contrast Media | January 30, 2018
Bracco Diagnostics Inc. announced the labeling of its contrast agent MultiHance has obtained U.S. Food and Drug...
Study Finds No Evidence that Gadolinium Causes Neurologic Harm

MR images through, A, C, E, basal ganglia and, B, D, F, posterior fossa at level of dentate nucleus. Images are shown for, A, B, control group patient 4, and the, C, D, first and, E, F, last examinations performed in contrast group patient 13. Regions of interest used in quantification of signal intensity are shown as dashed lines for globus pallidus (green), thalamus (blue), dentate nucleus (yellow), and pons (red).

News | Contrast Media | January 11, 2018
January 11, 2018 — There is no evidence that accumulation in the brain of the element gadolinium speeds cognitive dec
Overlay Init