Sponsored Content | Case Study | Radiology Imaging | September 09, 2015

The Effect of Planning Speed on VMAT Plan Quality

A planning study of complex prostate and head and neck cases in two different RayStation treatment planning setups (TPS)

Three plans and respective DVHs, P1B5 (solid), P1F4 (dashed), P1F5 (dotted)

Case one: Three plans and respective DVHs, P1B5 (solid), P1F4 (dashed), P1F5 (dotted)

Three plans and respective DVHs, P1B5 (solid), P1F4 (dashed), P1F5 (dotted)

Case one: Three plans and respective DVHs, P1B5 (solid), P1F4 (dashed), P1F5 (dotted)

Three plans and respective DVHs, P6F1 (solid), P6B5 (dashed), P6B4 (dotted)

Case two: Three plans and respective DVHs, P6F1 (solid), P6B5 (dashed), P6B4 (dotted)

Three plans and respective DVHs, P6F1 (solid), P6B5 (dashed), P6B4 (dotted)

Case two: Three plans and respective DVHs, P6F1 (solid), P6B5 (dashed), P6B4 (dotted)

Plan optimization and dose calculation for complex VMAT plans are computationally challenging tasks. Depending on the efficiency of the TPS implementation, and the hardware on which it runs, calculation times can range from a few minutes to up to more than a half hour. It stands to reason that a dosimetrist equipped with a high performing system should be able to produce plans of higher quality compared to one equipped with a slow system irrespective of his/her experience level. This study aims to measure the effect of planning speed on plan quality. 

 

Setup

20 people with IMRT and/or VMAT planning experience from clinics that use RayStation participated in the study. Two RayStation configurations were used. One was equivalent to the regular RayStation 4.7 and the other was slowed down so that optimizations and dose calculations took 4-5 times longer than usual. Two patient cases were used, one very complex prostate case and one complex head and neck case. For both cases, dual arc VMAT was used. For each case, a scoring system based on the fulfillment of clinical goals had been created and was communicated to the participants. In the first two-hour session, all participants planned the first case. Half of the participants used the fast system and half used the slow system. For the second two-hour session, all participants planned the second case and all changed system speeds. This way, all participants planned both cases and used both systems. The participants were not informed about the nature of the difference between the systems, only that there were two different types.

 

Main Result

All participants successfully created a plan in the allocated time. In the main analysis, seven users were excluded as they did not compute dose with the clinical dose engine in one or both cases. For the 13 remaining participants, we found that all users scored consistently better when using the fast systems and that the average improvement was 15 points using the above mentioned scoring.

 

Example Results

Case One. In the images on the left, the plan P1B5 was planned on a fast system and P1F4 and P1F5 on slow systems. P1F4 and P1F5 scored 10.9 and 18.3 points worse than P1B5, making them representative examples of the 15 point average score difference. In general, P1B5 achieved a much better conformity without sacrificing homogeneity.

Case Two. In the images above, the plan P6F1 was planned on a fast system and the plans P6B5 and P6B4 on slow systems. P6B5 and P6B4 scored 10.6 and 15.6 points worse than P1B5 making them representative examples of the 15 point average score difference. In general, P6F1 achieved a much better conformity without sacrificing homogeneity. 

 

Conclusion

Decreasing calculation times for VMAT planning from around 10-17 minutes for optimization and final dose calculation to around 2-4 minutes significantly increased the fulfillment of clinical goals. This shows the relevance of computation speed in planning complex cases and reinforces the importance that should be given to this. 

Case study supplied by RaySearch.

Related Content

Registration is now open for the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 107th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, the world’s largest annual radiology forum, to be held at McCormick Place Chicago, Nov. 28 – Dec. 2, 2021

Getty Images

News | RSNA | July 21, 2021
July 21, 2021 — Registration is now open for the Radiological Society of North America (...

Image courtesy of RaySearch

Feature | Treatment Planning | July 07, 2021 | Information provided by Grand View Research
RaySearch Laboratories AB announced an extension of its relationship with Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois (CHUV) in Lausanne, Switzerland, which will include orders for RayStation RayCare and RayIntelligence. 
News | Oncology Information Management Systems (OIMS) | June 28, 2021
June 28, 2021 — RaySearch Laboratories AB announced an extension of its relationship with...
Brain tumors edged out by artificial intelligence: VBrain applies auto-contouring to the three most common types of brain tumors: brain metastasis, meningioma and acoustic neuroma.

Brain tumors edged out by artificial intelligence: VBrain applies auto-contouring to the three most common types of brain tumors: brain metastasis, meningioma and acoustic neuroma.

News | Artificial Intelligence | April 07, 2021
April 7, 2021 — Vysioneer, a leader in a...
Stefan Vilsmeier Brainlab announced the acquisition of Mint Medical GmbH, a Heidelberg-based company that develops image reading and reporting software for clinical routine and research

Stefan Vilsmeier, President and CEO, Brainlab

News | Treatment Planning | March 10, 2021
March 10, 2021 — Brainlab announced the acquisition of Mint Medic...
Axial fused PET/CT image shows intense uptake (arrowhead) in the deep pelvis corresponding to the left lobe of the prostate in a 62-year-old with a history of prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy.  The CT scan does not show the tumor. Image courtesy of the the Radiological Society of North America.

Axial fused PET/CT image shows intense uptake (arrowhead) in the deep pelvis corresponding to the left lobe of the prostate in a 62-year-old with a history of prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy. The CT scan does not show the tumor. Image courtesy of the the Radiological Society of North America.

Feature | Treatment Planning | March 05, 2021 | By Melinda Taschetta-Millane
The decision to offer...
Interoperability between Brainlab and Accuray planning systems using Snke OS, an enterprise health tech platform
News | Treatment Planning | October 29, 2020
October 29, 2020 — Accuray Incorporated, a pioneer in the robotic stereotactic radiosurgery (...
Varian Drives Next Evolution of Proton Treatment Planning with Eclipse v16.1
News | Treatment Planning | September 15, 2020
September 15, 2020 — Varian announced it has received FDA 510(k) clearance for its Eclipse v16.1 treatment planning s
At the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) 2019 meeting, new artificial intelligence (AI) software to assist with radiotherapy treatment planning systems was highlighted. The goal of the AI-based systems is to save staff time, while still allowing clinicians to do the final patient review. 
Feature | Treatment Planning | July 08, 2020 | By Melinda Taschetta-Millane
At the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) 201