Sponsored Content | Case Study | Radiology Imaging | September 09, 2015

The Effect of Planning Speed on VMAT Plan Quality

A planning study of complex prostate and head and neck cases in two different RayStation treatment planning setups (TPS)

Three plans and respective DVHs, P1B5 (solid), P1F4 (dashed), P1F5 (dotted)

Case one: Three plans and respective DVHs, P1B5 (solid), P1F4 (dashed), P1F5 (dotted)

Three plans and respective DVHs, P1B5 (solid), P1F4 (dashed), P1F5 (dotted)

Case one: Three plans and respective DVHs, P1B5 (solid), P1F4 (dashed), P1F5 (dotted)

Three plans and respective DVHs, P6F1 (solid), P6B5 (dashed), P6B4 (dotted)

Case two: Three plans and respective DVHs, P6F1 (solid), P6B5 (dashed), P6B4 (dotted)

Three plans and respective DVHs, P6F1 (solid), P6B5 (dashed), P6B4 (dotted)

Case two: Three plans and respective DVHs, P6F1 (solid), P6B5 (dashed), P6B4 (dotted)

Plan optimization and dose calculation for complex VMAT plans are computationally challenging tasks. Depending on the efficiency of the TPS implementation, and the hardware on which it runs, calculation times can range from a few minutes to up to more than a half hour. It stands to reason that a dosimetrist equipped with a high performing system should be able to produce plans of higher quality compared to one equipped with a slow system irrespective of his/her experience level. This study aims to measure the effect of planning speed on plan quality. 

 

Setup

20 people with IMRT and/or VMAT planning experience from clinics that use RayStation participated in the study. Two RayStation configurations were used. One was equivalent to the regular RayStation 4.7 and the other was slowed down so that optimizations and dose calculations took 4-5 times longer than usual. Two patient cases were used, one very complex prostate case and one complex head and neck case. For both cases, dual arc VMAT was used. For each case, a scoring system based on the fulfillment of clinical goals had been created and was communicated to the participants. In the first two-hour session, all participants planned the first case. Half of the participants used the fast system and half used the slow system. For the second two-hour session, all participants planned the second case and all changed system speeds. This way, all participants planned both cases and used both systems. The participants were not informed about the nature of the difference between the systems, only that there were two different types.

 

Main Result

All participants successfully created a plan in the allocated time. In the main analysis, seven users were excluded as they did not compute dose with the clinical dose engine in one or both cases. For the 13 remaining participants, we found that all users scored consistently better when using the fast systems and that the average improvement was 15 points using the above mentioned scoring.

 

Example Results

Case One. In the images on the left, the plan P1B5 was planned on a fast system and P1F4 and P1F5 on slow systems. P1F4 and P1F5 scored 10.9 and 18.3 points worse than P1B5, making them representative examples of the 15 point average score difference. In general, P1B5 achieved a much better conformity without sacrificing homogeneity.

Case Two. In the images above, the plan P6F1 was planned on a fast system and the plans P6B5 and P6B4 on slow systems. P6B5 and P6B4 scored 10.6 and 15.6 points worse than P1B5 making them representative examples of the 15 point average score difference. In general, P6F1 achieved a much better conformity without sacrificing homogeneity. 

 

Conclusion

Decreasing calculation times for VMAT planning from around 10-17 minutes for optimization and final dose calculation to around 2-4 minutes significantly increased the fulfillment of clinical goals. This shows the relevance of computation speed in planning complex cases and reinforces the importance that should be given to this. 

Case study supplied by RaySearch.

Related Content

Canon Adds Radiation Therapy Package to Aquilion Prime, Lightning CT Systems
News | Computed Tomography (CT) | February 11, 2019
In the patient-centric world of radiation oncology, it is critical that computed tomography (CT) simulation is...
Philips Collaborates With MIM Software on Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning
News | Treatment Planning | January 31, 2019
January 31, 2019 — Philips announced a collaboration with imaging solutions provider MIM Software Inc.
MIM Software Inc. Receives FDA 510(k) Clearance for Molecular Radiotherapy Dosimetry
Technology | Nuclear Imaging | January 16, 2019
MIM Software Inc. received 510(k) clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for molecular radiotherapy...
RayStation 8B Released With Machine Learning Applications for Treatment Planning
Technology | Treatment Planning | December 27, 2018
RaySearch Laboratories released RayStation 8B, the latest version of the radiation therapy treatment planning system (...
RaySearch Developing RayCommand Treatment Control System for U.K. Proton Therapy Facility
Technology | Radiation Therapy | December 10, 2018
RaySearch has decided to develop a treatment control system, RayCommand, to act as a link between its RayStation...
Mirada Medical Joins U.K. Consortium Exploring Healthcare AI
News | Artificial Intelligence | December 04, 2018
Mirada Medical, a leading global brand in medical imaging software, will form part of an artificial intelligence (AI)...
This is the Siemens Magnetom Sola RT edition 1.5T MRI system optimized for radiation therapy displayed for the first time since gaining FDA clearance in 2018. It was displayed at the American Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ASTRO) 2018 annual meeting. Read more about this system at ASTRO 2018. #ASTRO18 #ASTRO2018
360 Photos | 360 View Photos | November 07, 2018
This is the Siemens Magnetom Sola RT edition 1.5T MRI system optimized for...
GE Healthcare Discovery RF Gen 2 system displayed at ASTRO 2018. It is a dedicated computed tomography (CT) scanner for radiation oncology
360 Photos | 360 View Photos | November 07, 2018
This is the GE Healthcare Discovery RF Gen 2 system displayed at the ...
Mirada Medical Showcases DLCExpert AI-Based Radiotherapy Contouring Software at ASTRO 2018
News | Treatment Planning | October 31, 2018
Medical imaging software company Mirada Medical showcased its DLCExpert at the recent American Society for Radiation...
Elekta Introduces Strategy for Precision Radiation Medicine at ASTRO 2018

Elekta SmartClinic is one of the key features in the Mosaiq Plaza suite of data-focused integrative oncology software

News | Radiation Therapy | October 30, 2018
At the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Annual Meeting, Oct. 21-24 in San Antonio, Elekta introduced the...