News | Mammography | August 22, 2017

Study comparing screening under three different guidelines finds starting at age 40 prevents the most cancer deaths

Comparison of Screening Recommendations Supports Annual Mammography. Marilyn Fornell

August 22, 2017 — When to initiate screening for breast cancer, how often to screen, and how long to screen are questions that continue to spark emotional debates. A new study compares the number of deaths that might be prevented as a result of three of the most widely discussed recommendations for screening mammography. Published early online in Cancer, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Cancer Society, the findings may provide valuable guidance to women and their physicians about choosing a screening regimen.

To uncover insights that might help women make informed choices about mammography screening, researchers led by Elizabeth Kagan Arleo, M.D., of Weill Cornell Medicine and New York-Presbyterian, and R. Edward Hendrick, Ph.D., of the University of Colorado School of Medicine, used computer modeling to estimate the possible effects of three schemes: annual screening starting at age 40 years, annual screening at ages 45 to 54 years and then biennial screening at ages 55 to 79 years, and biennial screening at ages 50 to 74 years.

The investigators estimated how many breast cancer deaths might be prevented with the different screening schemes. The team found that the recommendation of annual screening starting at age 40 would result in the greatest reduction in breast cancer-specific deaths — a nearly 40 percent reduction in deaths due to breast cancer, compared with 23 percent to 31 percent reductions with other recommendations.

"Our findings are important and novel because this is the first time the three most widely discussed recommendations for screening mammography have been compared head to head," said Arleo. "Our research would be put to good use if, because of our findings, women chose to start annual screening mammography starting at age 40. Over the long term, this would be significant because fewer women would die from breast cancer."

The researchers' modeling also considered risks associated with screening, including callbacks for additional imaging and, in some cases, a needle biopsy, both of which may reveal the absence of breast cancer despite a suspicious mammography finding.

"Our results show the differences in the three current recommendations for screening mammography in terms of benefits and risks. Women and their physicians can use these findings to guide choices of when a woman begins screening mammography and how often she gets screened," said Hendrick.

An estimated 252,710 new cases of invasive breast cancer and 63,410 new cases of non-invasive breast cancer are expected to be diagnosed in women in the United States in 2017, with 40,610 U.S. women expected to die from breast cancer in 2017. About 33 million screening mammography exams are performed each year.

In an accompanying editorial, Otis Brawley, M.D., of the American Cancer Society, noted that it is ultimately an individual's value judgment as to how many false positive mammograms and biopsies are too many to save one life. He stressed that it is important to acknowledge the limitations of mammography and to make it a priority to develop a better test. "The ideal test would be easy to administer and accurate in women of all ages, meaning there would be few false positives and few tumors would be missed," he wrote.

For more information: www.canceronline.wiley.com


Related Content

News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Feb. 5, 2026 — Eyas Medical Imaging, Inc. has received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 510(k) clearance for its ...

Time February 06, 2026
arrow
News | Ultrasound Women's Health

Feb. 5, 2026 — BrightHeart, a global provider of AI-driven prenatal ultrasound, has announced the availability of its B ...

Time February 05, 2026
arrow
News | Radiation Therapy

Feb. 4, 2026 — On World Cancer Day (02.04.26), the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and the European ...

Time February 04, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Imaging

Feb. 4, 2026 — The Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) has issued its initial reaction to the British government's ...

Time February 04, 2026
arrow
News | FDA

Feb. 2, 2026 — Imagion Biosystems, Ltd. has submitted an Investigational New Drug (IND) application with the U.S. Food ...

Time February 02, 2026
arrow
News | Breast Imaging | Washington University

Jan. 22, 2026 — In breast cancer, a biopsy is the only diagnostic procedure that can determine if a suspicious lump or ...

Time January 29, 2026
arrow
News | Radiation Oncology

Jan. 27, 2026 — Researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, in collaboration with other leading ...

Time January 29, 2026
arrow
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Jan. 27, 2026 — Hyperfine has announced results from the largest data set to date evaluating stroke detection with its ...

Time January 28, 2026
arrow
News | PET Imaging

Jan. 26, 2026 — Nuclidium, a clinical-stage radiopharmaceutical company developing a proprietary copper-based ...

Time January 27, 2026
arrow
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Jan. 20, 2026 — Hyperfine, the developer of the first FDA-cleared AI-powered portable MRI system for the brain — the ...

Time January 20, 2026
arrow
Subscribe Now