Greg Freiherr, Industry Consultant
Greg Freiherr, Industry Consultant

Greg Freiherr has reported on developments in radiology since 1983. He runs the consulting service, The Freiherr Group.

Blog | Greg Freiherr, Industry Consultant | Cybersecurity| July 27, 2016

Protecting Patients From Hackers

hackers, cyber security

Image courtesy of Pixabay

The Internet of Things (IoT) has carved an in-road for hackers to just about everything electronic from e-mail servers to automobiles and Internet-connected kitchen refrigerators. Imaging equipment is just a segment of that unsafe world — but a remarkably vulnerable one.

Hackers are targeting networked imaging devices, particularly those using outdated operating systems, such as Windows XP, non-patched versions of Windows 7 and 8, and Windows NT. Three cases illustrate these vulnerabilities, one involving a fluoroscopy system; the second an MRI scanner; the third an X-ray system. All served as backdoors for the entry of malware designed to gain access to patient data. In each case, the attack was thwarted by software that trapped and contained the malware.

Cyber attacks in all three hospitals focused on vulnerable medical devices, ones that were attacked even though the hospital had intrusion detection software and elaborate firewalls.

 

What Hackers Want

The goal behind cyber attacks typically is the acquisition of patient data, which — because of their potential for insurance fraud — has a value 20 times that of credit cards on the black market, according to TrapX Security, whose software stopped the malware in the three documented instances.

Hackers have already determined, said TrapX, that the vulnerabilities posed by networked medical devices “are so extreme as to make healthcare the easiest choice for their attack.”

And hackers are taking advantage of it. According to a 2015 report by the Identity Theft Resource Center, cyber breaches at healthcare institutions represented about one third of reported incidents nationwide.

“Connected medical devices, applications and software used by healthcare organizations … are fast becoming targets of choice for nefarious hackers taking advantage of the IoT to carry out all manner of illicit transactions, data thefts and attacks,” according to a SANS Institute whitepaper. And radiology may be a substantial source of the problem. Over a 12-month period, spanning 2012 and 2013, the company, which specializes in information security and cyber security training, found that 7 percent of “malicious traffic” came from radiology imaging software.

 

Medjacking

The use of malware to hijack medical equipment, dubbed “medjacking,” directly threatens hospital operations and the security of patient data, according to TrapX. Hackers focus on networked medical devices because they are the easiest and most vulnerable points of entry into a hospital information system, according to Moshe Ben Simon, cofounder and VP of TrapX Security. Their attacks, Simon wrote, are designed “to rapidly penetrate devices, establish command-and-control, and then use these as pivot points to hijack and ‘exfiltrate’ data from across the healthcare institution.”

At RSNA 2015, the Medical Imaging and Technology Alliance (MITA), a division of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association, drew attention to the danger that radiology faces from cyber attack, distributing a MITA whitepaper on the subject. The chair of the committee that generated the whitepaper, Rik Primo, said in a prepared statement that the solution requires a collaboration of people, processes, and technologies “to safeguard the patients’ protected health information and their physical safety.”

 

Threat From Mobile Devices

The chance that hackers will gain access has increased with the use of mobile devices, particularly by radiologists who use laptops, tablets and even cell phones to interpret images. A 2013 paper in the American Journal of Roentgenology encouraged radiologists to be careful where and how they connect these devices to healthcare networks. “As the role of information technology and modern radiology practice becomes more critical, safety mechanisms must be addressed when viewing studies on any mobile device,” the authors wrote.

Meanwhile, the users of medical imaging equipment should test their devices for vulnerabilities using “threat” models, according to the MITA whitepaper: “A device can be considered secure if it defends against unintended or unauthorized operation with respect to its intended environment and its intended use — as specified by its manufacturer.”

Cyber security in medical imaging is a shared responsibility between healthcare providers and manufacturers, according to the paper: “Imaging staff must be aware of cyber security threats and best-in-class practices.”

The ultimate goal is “zero-breach cyber security.”

While that goal may prove elusive, efforts to reach it will surely help.

 

Editor's note: This is the final blog in a four-part series on patient centricity. The first blog, “Value Medicine: Radiology’s Big Chance,” can be found here. “What To Do About The Draper Effect” can be found here. “The Case Against Quantitation” can be found here.

Related Content

CMS Proposes New Alternative Payment Model for Radiation Oncology
News | Radiation Oncology | July 17, 2019
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposal for an advanced alternative payment model (APM)...
Anatomage Releases Anatomage Cloud Platform
News | Remote Viewing Systems | July 16, 2019
Anatomage Inc. released an update to the Anatomage Cloud platform that allows medical and dental professionals to...
Graphic courtesy Pixabay

Graphic courtesy Pixabay

Feature | Artificial Intelligence | July 15, 2019 | By Greg Freiherr
Siemens has long focused on automation as a way to make diagnostic equipment faster and more efficient.
Videos | Artificial Intelligence | July 12, 2019
Khan Siddiqui, M.D., founder and CEO of HOPPR, discusses the economic advantages and costs presented by...
Routine scan of abdomen pelvis taken with the UW-Madison’s Revolution 256 CT scanner using the FDA-cleared reconstruction algorithm, called TrueFidelity.

Routine scan of abdomen pelvis taken with the UW-Madison’s Revolution 256 CT scanner using the FDA-cleared reconstruction algorithm, called TrueFidelity. UW-Madison was the first site in the U.S. to get this technology. Its use is now being integrated into UW CT protocols. Image courtesy of Timothy P. Szczykutowicz

Feature | Computed Tomography (CT) | July 12, 2019 | By Greg Freiherr
When providers develop their own imaging protocols, they are wasting time and money, according to...
Videos | Enterprise Imaging | July 09, 2019
ITN Associate Editor Jeff Zagoudis speaks with Don Dennison
Videos | Enterprise Imaging | July 08, 2019
ITN Associate Editor Jeff Zagoudis speaks with Don Dennison
Infervision Releases InferTEST Program at SIIM 2019
News | Artificial Intelligence | July 08, 2019
Infervision announced their InferTEST program at the recent Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM)...
Hyland Healthcare Adds ImageNext Imaging Workflow Optimizer to Enterprise Imaging Suite
Technology | Enterprise Imaging | July 05, 2019
Hyland Healthcare is launching ImageNext, a vendor-neutral imaging workflow optimizer that combines intelligent imaging...