Greg Freiherr, Industry Consultant
Greg Freiherr, Industry Consultant

Greg Freiherr has reported on developments in radiology since 1983. He runs the consulting service, The Freiherr Group.

Blog | Greg Freiherr, Industry Consultant | Computed Tomography (CT) | September 22, 2015

CT Royalty Turns to Value in Buyers’ Market

Dual-energy scanning

Dual-energy scanning, achieved on Siemens’ Definition Edge, reduces severe artifacts caused by an implanted pump (left), clearly visualizing surrounding anatomical structures (right). The twin-beam, single-source Edge is one of several platforms that can characterize tissues and structures according to the atomic numbers of their elements. (Image courtesy of Siemens Healthcare)

They were once the kings of computed tomography (CT) — 16-slice scanners that hinted at coronary CT angiography; 64 slicers that delivered it. Today they are entry level and mid-tier products: streamlined in function; optimized for dose; automated for efficiency; and reduced — dramatically — in price.

Beyond them at the high-end are premium scanners producing — even exceeding — 256 slices per rotation. Some can characterize tissue based on the atomic numbers of its elements, an extraordinary capability that puts CT on the cusp of molecular imaging.

Who buys what in the range from entry to premium CT depends on the priorities of buyers. Judging those priorities has become more complex than any time in the past 50 years.

On the heels of a government effort to reduce Americans’ exposure to radiation, low-dose imaging has cut to the head of the line of considerations. In the broader scheme, a fundamental shift from volume to value in the practice of medicine is leading prospective buyers to look carefully at the cost effectiveness and efficiency of CT scanners in the context of extended clinical capabilities.

The time for such a shift couldn’t be better. CT bargains abound. Sixteen-slice scanners today average $402,000, according to industry data, compared with more than a million dollars when multi-slice scanners were introduced in 1998. Today the more powerful 64- and 80-slice scanners average $549,000. Premium scanners average $1.29 million (although optimized dual-energy or spectral CTs may cost substantially more).

Price didn’t matter much 10 years ago. Prospective buyers favored power as insurance against obsolescence. Introduced in 2004, 64-slice CTs promised everything radiology could need. Lightning fast scans enabling whole body scans, coronary CTA and stroke evaluations catapulted new equipment sales to record sales in the coming years.

Sales of successive generations of premium scanners have since fallen short. The reason is simple. Rather than advance the everyday practice of radiology, they addressed super-premium applications associated more with cardiology and neurology than radiology.

For much the same reason, the “insurance” argument does not apply today. This is despite a glaring historical precedent, namely the advent of helical (also called spiral) scanning of the early 1990s.

Helical/spiral scanning was once the hallmark of premium scanning. It became a staple of CT platforms at all levels, serving as the cornerstone of multi-slice CT in 1998. In an arguably similar way, today spectral/dual-energy CT (DECT) is premium CT. Like helical/spiral CT, it offers advantages in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients. 

But there are important differences between the two that argue against mass migration of spectral/dual-energy. Even though DECT has been available commercially for a decade, it has been only selectively adopted outside academia.[1] Also, spectral/DECT scanning does not rely on a single foundation of mechanical and electronic assemblies, as did helical/spiral CT. Instead, spectral and dual-energy are on divergent paths.

Spectral CT leverages an advanced detector that records data delivered by X-rays of different energies contained in a multichromatic beam. DECT transmits two monochromatic beams of distinctly different energies. These beams may come from a single imaging chain that switches between two energies or a dual-source system composed of two separate imaging chains.

Given its limited adoption and divergent underlying technologies, spectral/dual-energy CT will not migrate as helical/spiral scanning did. It is likely, however, that these platforms will be adopted with increasing enthusiasm.

Determining which sites will buy what in the range from entry to premium scanners will turn on understanding the needs of the facilities and the patients they serve. Or, at least, it should.

 

Reference:

1. Marin D, Boll DT, Mileto A, et al. State of the art: dual-energy CT of the abdomen. Radiology. 2014 May; 271 (2):327-42. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14131480

 

Editor’s note: This is the third blog in a series of four by industry consultant Greg Freiherr on CT systems. The first blog in this series, “Three Ways CT Will Radically Change — When and How,” can be found here. The second blog in this series, "Two Reasons Why CT Providers Shouldn't Panic About XR-29," can be found here.

Related Content

Largest case series (n=30) to date yields high frequency (77%) of negative chest CT findings among pediatric patients (10 months-18 years) with COVID-19, while also suggesting common findings in subset of children with positive CT findings

A and B, Unenhanced chest CT scans show minimal GGOs (right lower and left upper lobes) (arrows) and no consolidation. Only two lobes were affected, and CT findings were assigned CT severity score of 2. Image courtesy of American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR)

News | Coronavirus (COVID-19) | May 29, 2020
May 29, 2020 — An investigation published open-access in the ...
Examples of chest CT images of COVID-19 (+) patients and visualization of features correlated to COVID-19 positivity. For each pair of images, the left image is a CT image showing the segmented lung used as input for the CNN (convolutional neural network algorithm) model trained on CT images only, and the right image shows the heatmap of pixels that the CNN model classified as having SARS-CoV-2 infection (red indicates higher probability). (a) A 51-year-old female with fever and history of exposure to SARS-

Figure 1: Examples of chest CT images of COVID-19 (+) patients and visualization of features correlated to COVID-19 positivity. For each pair of images, the left image is a CT image showing the segmented lung used as input for the CNN (convolutional neural network algorithm) model trained on CT images only, and the right image shows the heatmap of pixels that the CNN model classified as having SARS-CoV-2 infection (red indicates higher probability). (a) A 51-year-old female with fever and history of exposure to SARS-CoV-2. The CNN model identified abnormal features in the right lower lobe (white color), whereas the two radiologists labeled this CT as negative. (b) A 52-year-old female who had a history of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and presented with fever and productive cough. Bilateral peripheral ground-glass opacities (arrows) were labeled by the radiologists, and the CNN model predicted positivity based on features in matching areas. (c) A 72-year-old female with exposure history to the animal market in Wuhan presented with fever and productive cough. The segmented CT image shows ground-glass opacity in the anterior aspect of the right lung (arrow), whereas the CNN model labeled this CT as negative. (d) A 59-year-old female with cough and exposure history. The segmented CT image shows no evidence of pneumonia, and the CNN model also labeled this CT as negative.  

News | Coronavirus (COVID-19) | May 19, 2020
May 19, 2020 — Mount Sinai researchers are the first in the country to use...
Advanced imaging data exchange is now live in Colorado due to the partnership of Health Images and the Colorado Regional Health Information Organization

Getty Images

News | Radiology Business | May 18, 2020
May 18, 2020 — 
Radiologists from Shanghai discuss modifying exam process and disinfecting exam room, while outlining personal protection measures during the coronavirus disease outbreak

(HIS = hospital information system, RIS = radiology information system) Image courtesy of American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR)

News | Coronavirus (COVID-19) | May 18, 2020
May 18, 2020 — In an open-access article published ahead-of-print
Now a research team — led by Tohoku University Professor, Wataru Yashiro — has developed a new method using intense synchrotron radiation that produces higher quality images within milliseconds.

How the bent crystal changes the direction of the X-rays. Image courtesy of Tohoku University

News | Computed Tomography (CT) | May 15, 2020
May 15, 2020 — Many will undergo a computed tomogr...
In today’s challenging healthcare environment, radiology departments are often faced with the difficult decision of how to safely image patients who are suspected of being positive with infectious disease. To help hospitals and institutions effectively utilize computed tomography (CT) with these conditions, Canon Medical Systems USA, Inc. introduces a deployable CT with a rapid decontamination solution.
News | Computed Tomography (CT) | May 11, 2020
May 11, 2020 — In today’s challenging healthcare environment, radiology departments are often faced with the difficul
Axial (A) and coronal (B) CT of the abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast in a 57-year-old man with a high clinical suspicion for bowel ischemia. There was generalized small bowel distension and segmental thickening (arrows), with adjacent mesenteric congestion (thin arrow in B), and a small volume of ascites (* in B). Findings are nonspecific but suggestive of early ischemia or infection.

Axial (A) and coronal (B) CT of the abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast in a 57-year-old man with a high clinical suspicion for bowel ischemia. There was generalized small bowel distension and segmental thickening (arrows), with adjacent mesenteric congestion (thin arrow in B), and a small volume of ascites (* in B). Findings are nonspecific but suggestive of early ischemia or infection. Image courtesy of RSNA

News | Coronavirus (COVID-19) | May 11, 2020
May 11, 2020 — Patients with COVID-19 can have b