News | Radiology Business | October 02, 2019

There is no consensus among academic radiologists regarding how to handle second-opinion consultations on outside studies, says AJR article

raph shows responses of members of Society of Chairs of Academic Radiology Departments to question “Do you add all OSS images to your PACS?”

Graph shows responses of members of Society of Chairs of Academic Radiology Departments to question “Do you add all OSS images to your PACS?”. OSS = outside studies.


According to an ahead-of-print article published in the January issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), there is no consensus among academic radiologists regarding how to handle second-opinion consultations on outside studies (OSS).

Analyzing completed surveys from 91 members of the Society of Chairs of Academic Radiology Departments (SCARD), lead investigators Parisa Khoshpouri and Pegah Khoshpouri found that 70 respondents (76.9 percent) added OSS to their institutional PACS, and 34 (37.4 percent) required formal internal reports on all OSS.

In contrast, 74 (81.3 percent) allowed at least some OSS into their PACS, without requiring an internal report.

“Many respondents interpreted outside studies only if specifically requested,” Khoshpouri and Khoshpouri noted.

A majority (67/91 [73.6 percent]) billed insurers — though not patients (61/91 [67 percent]) — for the second-opinion consultations. Meanwhile, 15 (16.5 percent) preferred repeating studies, rather than including OSS in the PACS.

With minimal exceptions, the results from the 91 of 160 invited (56.9 percent) SCARD respondents paralleled the results from the 35 of 106 invited (33 percent) Association of Administration in Academic Radiology members.

“Developing a best practices statement that addresses patient care, medicolegal implications for radiology departments and referring physicians, financial implications, and quality and safety precepts would be a useful endeavor for organized radiology,” stated Khoshpouri and Khoshpouri.

“In so doing,” they continued, “radiologists may gain more clarity from a malpractice mitigation standpoint and have greater leverage with payers for appropriate reimbursement for their professional expertise.”


For more information: American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS)


Related Content

News | PACS

November 28, 2022 — At this week’s Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) annual meeting (November 27 – December 1 ...

Time November 28, 2022
arrow
News | RSNA

November 28, 2022 — Adam E. Flanders, M.D., FSIIM, a prolific mentor, author and pioneer for digital learning, was ...

Time November 28, 2022
arrow
News | RSNA | By Christine Book

November 27, 2022 — Among dozens of technical exhibit visits, informative discussions, and captivating Plenary Session ...

Time November 27, 2022
arrow
News | RSNA

November 23, 2022 — With the aim of cultivating global partnerships and improving health equity, access, safety and ...

Time November 23, 2022
arrow
News | RSNA

Updated November 29, 2022 — The Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) has announced the official results of the ...

Time November 23, 2022
arrow
News | PACS

November 21, 2022 — Konica Minolta Healthcare Americas, Inc. announced today it is working toward offering its leading ...

Time November 21, 2022
arrow
Feature | RSNA | By Alan Stoddart

Top 10 Predictions for RSNA 2022 was published as an infographic as part of Signify Research's Premium Insights service ...

Time November 17, 2022
arrow
News | Enterprise Imaging

November 15, 2022 — Intelerad Medical Systems, a leading global provider of enterprise medical imaging solutions ...

Time November 15, 2022
arrow
News | Enterprise Imaging

November 15, 2022 — Change Healthcare continues to lead healthcare’s transition from on-premise imaging systems to cloud ...

Time November 15, 2022
arrow
News | Digital Pathology

November 9, 2022 — GE Healthcare and Tribun Health have entered a collaboration with the intent to provide digital ...

Time November 09, 2022
arrow
Subscribe Now