Feature | June 27, 2006 | Cristen C. Bolan

An Open Discussion on Open Source

Cristen C. Bolan, Editor

Communication is a scary thing. It divulges information that could be used against you. On the other hand, without it, we would be information silos – a term we often hear when discussing disparate PACS and EHR interoperability.
We all know by now that integrating disparate medical imaging systems is a challenge because there are information silos, and breaking down silos frequently causes an uproar of some sort.
When the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) formed a committee in 1983 to develop the DICOM standard, their intent was to promote communication of digital image information, regardless of device manufacturer, to interface PACS with the rest the hospital information systems and to build databases accessible by a wide variety of devices distributed geographically. This was pretty visionary at the time, and it was met with hesitation from fears of security breaches and protection of proprietary information. Since then, however, DICOM has been widely adopted in radiology as well as in pathology, internal medicine, veterinary medicine and dentistry.
Here we are twenty years later, trying to connect the disparate medical information systems this time across the U.S. and the thought of using open source architecture to connect the EHR is not met with a loud uproar but with cautious whispers in the medical community. Take open source PACS – its benefits include free or low-cost systems, freedom to choose best-of-breed hardware platforms and software operating systems, plus, it is interoperable – which works well when you’re trying to hook up a nationwide-EHR system. Aren’t radiologists looking for remote access to images, on any type of workstation, including Microsoft Windows, Linux, Macintosh, Pocket PC and Palm PDA?
Open source has already taken off in consumer products with Linux and other kinds of open-source software popping up in a host of devices and technologies – from TiVo to cell phones. We learn in this issue’s article EMR Proves Profitable for Multispecialty Practices that one of the biggest upfront costs when implementing EHR is licensing software to interface systems. According to a new report by the California HealthCare Foundation, open-source software will lower the cost of health IT and help physicians share information. With the pressures on healthcare to cut costs, how can you argue with that?
Some arguments against open architecture are that it could run the risk of security breaches, it could have performance issues and there are questions surrounding protection of patient identification. The quick answer to these concerns is to look to your online banking system – security breaches are handled through encryption and firewalls. As for performance, one of the benefits of open-source coding is that programmers enhance the program. And a universal patient identifier could address the patient I.D. issue. Still, there are semantics, or more specifically, ontology-based integration of medical coding systems – that’s more than a mouthful for most programmers to chew on. But should it stop interoperability?
What the medical industry needs to accept is that both proprietary and open-source providers will play critical roles in the auspicious task of building the EHR – whether they want to talk about it or not. After all, who would have thought that Windows would one day be running on a Mac?

Related Content

HHS Extends Comment Period for Proposed Electronic Health Information Interoperability Rules
News | Electronic Medical Records (EMR) | April 19, 2019
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is extending the public comment period by 30 days for two...
DrChrono and 3D4Medical Partner to Bring 3-D Interactive Modeling to Physician Practices
News | Advanced Visualization | March 18, 2019
DrChrono Inc. and 3D4Medical have teamed up so practices across the United States can access 3-D interactive modeling...
IBM Watson Health Announces New AI Collaborations With Leading Medical Centers
News | Artificial Intelligence | February 14, 2019
IBM Watson Health announced plans to make a 10-year, $50 million investment in research collaborations with two...
Life Image and Mendel.ai Bringing Artificial Intelligence to Clinical Trial Development
News | Artificial Intelligence | November 15, 2018
Life Image and Mendel.ai announced a new strategic partnership that will facilitate the adoption and enhancement of...
News | PACS Accessories | October 01, 2018
M*Modal announced that several large U.S. health systems have adopted its cloud-based artificial intelligence (AI)...
Technology | Electronic Medical Records (EMR) | September 25, 2018
TransformativeMed, a provider of directly embedded, smart clinical workflow solutions for electronic health records (...
Study Points to Need for Performance Standards for EHR Usability and Safety
News | Electronic Medical Records (EMR) | July 18, 2018
A novel new study provides compelling evidence that the design, development and implementation of electronic health...
Drchrono EHR Partners With Ambra Health for Medical Imaging Access
News | Remote Viewing Systems | March 14, 2018
drchrono Inc. announced a new partnership with Ambra Health to give physicians and radiologists direct access to...
Cerner is extending its population health, clinical and administration portfolio with an integrated solution that combines Salesforce Health Cloud and Marketing Cloud with Cerner’s HealtheIntent, its big data platform.
News | Electronic Medical Records (EMR) | March 06, 2018
Cerner announced a new collaboration with Salesforce, a global leader in customer relationship management (CRM). Cerner...
electronic medical records
News | Electronic Medical Records (EMR) | June 15, 2017
During the first quarter of 2017, Black Book surveyed 140 chief information officers (CIOs), 159 chief financial...