Feature | June 27, 2006 | Cristen C. Bolan

An Open Discussion on Open Source

Cristen C. Bolan, Editor

Communication is a scary thing. It divulges information that could be used against you. On the other hand, without it, we would be information silos – a term we often hear when discussing disparate PACS and EHR interoperability.
We all know by now that integrating disparate medical imaging systems is a challenge because there are information silos, and breaking down silos frequently causes an uproar of some sort.
When the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) formed a committee in 1983 to develop the DICOM standard, their intent was to promote communication of digital image information, regardless of device manufacturer, to interface PACS with the rest the hospital information systems and to build databases accessible by a wide variety of devices distributed geographically. This was pretty visionary at the time, and it was met with hesitation from fears of security breaches and protection of proprietary information. Since then, however, DICOM has been widely adopted in radiology as well as in pathology, internal medicine, veterinary medicine and dentistry.
Here we are twenty years later, trying to connect the disparate medical information systems this time across the U.S. and the thought of using open source architecture to connect the EHR is not met with a loud uproar but with cautious whispers in the medical community. Take open source PACS – its benefits include free or low-cost systems, freedom to choose best-of-breed hardware platforms and software operating systems, plus, it is interoperable – which works well when you’re trying to hook up a nationwide-EHR system. Aren’t radiologists looking for remote access to images, on any type of workstation, including Microsoft Windows, Linux, Macintosh, Pocket PC and Palm PDA?
Open source has already taken off in consumer products with Linux and other kinds of open-source software popping up in a host of devices and technologies – from TiVo to cell phones. We learn in this issue’s article EMR Proves Profitable for Multispecialty Practices that one of the biggest upfront costs when implementing EHR is licensing software to interface systems. According to a new report by the California HealthCare Foundation, open-source software will lower the cost of health IT and help physicians share information. With the pressures on healthcare to cut costs, how can you argue with that?
Some arguments against open architecture are that it could run the risk of security breaches, it could have performance issues and there are questions surrounding protection of patient identification. The quick answer to these concerns is to look to your online banking system – security breaches are handled through encryption and firewalls. As for performance, one of the benefits of open-source coding is that programmers enhance the program. And a universal patient identifier could address the patient I.D. issue. Still, there are semantics, or more specifically, ontology-based integration of medical coding systems – that’s more than a mouthful for most programmers to chew on. But should it stop interoperability?
What the medical industry needs to accept is that both proprietary and open-source providers will play critical roles in the auspicious task of building the EHR – whether they want to talk about it or not. After all, who would have thought that Windows would one day be running on a Mac?

Related Content

electronic medical records
News | Electronic Medical Records (EMR) | June 15, 2017
During the first quarter of 2017, Black Book surveyed 140 chief information officers (CIOs), 159 chief financial...
News | PACS Accessories | April 25, 2017
April 25, 2017 — ImageMoverMD announced the availability of ImageMover Media, a universal, web-based solution to...
ECRI Institute, top 10 patient safety concerns, 2017 report, information technology, healthcare
News | Information Technology | March 24, 2017
Safe implementation of new technologies and therapies accompany classic patient safety challenges on ECRI Institute's “...
Logicalis Healthcare Solutions, Epic service desk, HIMSS17
News | Electronic Medical Records (EMR) | March 06, 2017
March 6, 2017 — Logicalis Healthcare Solutions announced in February a new service desk offering – Service Desk for E
HIMSS Leadership and Workforce Survey, HIMSS17, electronic medical records, EMR, health information technology
News | Electronic Medical Records (EMR) | February 21, 2017
A new study from the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS), unveiled at the 2017 HIMSS...
Logicalis Healthcare Solutions, top five cybersecurity issues, CIOs, chief information officers, HIMSS17
News | Electronic Medical Records (EMR) | February 10, 2017
With the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society’s annual meeting (HIMSS17) scheduled for Feb. 19-23 in...
Logicalis US, healthcare CIOs, enterprise imaging, value-based care, new white paper, seven tips
News | Enterprise Imaging | January 20, 2017
To help healthcare chief information officers (CIOs) examine the important role enterprise imaging plays in value-based...
AMA, American Medical Association study, EMRs, electronic medical records, physician burnout
News | Electronic Medical Records (EMR) | September 07, 2016
Technological and administrative obstacles are significantly cutting into available time for physicians to engage with...
EMR
Feature | Electronic Medical Records (EMR) | September 07, 2016 | By Erin Martin
From streamlining your workflow to maximizing your return on investment (ROI), there are numerous benefits to having...
HIE, health information exchanges, participation strategy, Binghamton University
News | Information Technology | August 18, 2016
The U.S. healthcare industry has failed to create and sustain an efficient network for storing and sharing patient...
Overlay Init