Feature | Contrast Media Injectors | January 30, 2020 | By Melinda Taschetta-Millane

Contrast Media Injectors Market Outlook

This article ran as an introduction to the Contrast Media Injector comparison chart in the January/February 2020 issue. You can view the chart here.

Image courtesy of Guerbet

Contrast media injector technology has seen several recent advances, such as cutting costs by reducing contrast waste and automated data collection for the dose a patient receives. Automated injector systems help to precisely control the amount of contrast used, and vendors have moved into the software/IT arena by offering personalized doses for patients using information pulled from an electronic medical record (EMR) or picture archiving and communication system (PACS). Contrast dose recording software also offers new possibilities for radiology departments looking to streamline and document their contrast media usage. 

In addition, physicians are wanting a safer contrast media option. In a recent survey presented by Ligand Pharmaceuticals at Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology — Acute Kidney Injury Conference July 2019, conducted by Giles & Associates Consultancy in October 2018, 63 hospital specialists involved in contrast-enhanced angiography were asked about their concerns and decision-making in selecting contrast agents. These specialists had input or decision-making roles in contrast selection, and included radiologists, interventional cardiologists, radiopharmacists and nephrologists. All respondents were familiar with current contrast agent options. According to the results, the need for safer contrast agents emerged as a common theme.

The survey results stated that “98 percent of survey respondents reported pre-screening prospective patients for elevated renal risk. Nephrologists estimate 23 percent of patients have elevated risk, with associated conditions ranging from anemia and hypertension, to diabetes and history of renal dysfunction.” Ninety percent of responding clinicians reported deferring patients from contrast imaging because of renal risk with, on average, 12 percent of all patients being deferred. The study cites that nephrologists defer considerably more patients than do other specialties (18 percent vs. approximately 11 percent). Other important results from the survey concluded that:

• When risk mitigation measures are employed for high risk patients, on average 86 percent of physicians reported using hydration protocols, 82 percent use reduced contrast agent volume/reduced repeat dosing and 72 percent use alternative contrast agents.

• Increased safety in general was the most desired improvement for IV contrast agents, followed by reduced cost and effectiveness.

• Renal toxicity reduction was identified as the single most important improvement needed with contrast agents.

Personalized Imaging

Speaking to this need, Bayer recently announced the introduction of the Medrad Stellant Flex computed tomography (CT) injection system. Stellant Flex offers Bayer’s CT injection technology with a user-driven design, minimal required technologist training, and automation that drives individualized patient protocols and personalized imaging.

With this new injector, Bayer said it addresses the changing U.S. healthcare environment which has seen an overall decrease in capital funding. This often results in reduced operational budgets for hospitals, creating the need for institutions to work more efficiently and economically while maintaining quality patient care. The Medrad Stellant Flex CT injection system was designed to help address these clinical and financial challenges.  

Market Outlook

The contrast media injectors market is projected to reach $1.83 billion by 2024 up from $1.33 billion in 2019, at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.1 percent during the forecast period, according to the “Contrast Media Injectors Market by Product, Consumables, Accessories, Application and End Users — Global Forecast to 2024” report from ResearchAndMarkets.com.

The report cites factors such as the growing prevalence of cancer and cardiovascular disease; a growing list of approvals for contrast agents; and increasing investments, funds and grants by government organizations that are driving the growth of this market. Yet cost plays a factor, and according to the report, the high cost of contrast media injectors, and also consumables and accessories, is somewhat restraining the growth of the market.

Currently, the radiology segment dominates the contrast media injector applications market. According to the report, “Based on application, the contrast media injectors market is segmented into radiology, interventional radiology and interventional cardiology. In 2018, the hospital radiology segment accounted for the largest share of this market. The rising number of radiology procedures using contrast media is driving the growth of this application segment.” Diagnostic imaging centers had the second largest market share of the contrast media injector end-user market during the forecast period. 

“Based on end-user, the contrast media injectors market is segmented into hospitals and diagnostic imaging centers,” according to the global forecast report, stating that key factors contributing to the growth of diagnostic imaging centers is the increase in the number of private imaging centers — fueled by the rising demand for early diagnosis and diagnostic imaging — and lack of imaging modalities in smaller and mid-sized hospitals.

Related content:

Contrast Media Injectors Comparison Chart

 

Related Content

A patient implanted with the Axonics System can undergo MRI examinations safely with radio frequency (RF) Transmit Body or Head Coil under the conditions outlined in the Axonics MRI Conditional Guidelines.

A patient implanted with the Axonics System can undergo MRI examinations safely with radio frequency (RF) Transmit Body or Head Coil under the conditions outlined in the Axonics MRI Conditional Guidelines.

News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | July 02, 2020
July 2, 2020 — Axonics Modulation Technologies, Inc., a medical technology company that has developed and is commerci
This data represents wave 2 of a QuickPoLL survey conducted in partnership with an imagePRO panel created by The MarkeTech Group (TMTG), regarding the effects of COVID-19 on their business

Getty Images

Feature | Coronavirus (COVID-19) | July 01, 2020 | By Melinda Taschetta-Millane
A 3-D ultrasound system provides an effective, noninvasive way to estimate blood flow that retains its accuracy across different equipment, operators and facilities, according to a study published in the journal Radiology.

Volume flow as a function of color flow gain (at a single testing site). For each row the color flow c-plane and the computed volume flow are shown as a function of color flow gain. The c-plane is shown for four representative gain levels, whereas the computed volume flow is shown for 12–17 steps across the available gain settings. Flow was computed with (solid circles on the graphs) and without (hollow circles on the graphs) partial volume correction. Partial volume correction accounts for pixels that are only partially inside the lumen. Therefore, high gain (ie, blooming) does not result in overestimation of flow. Systems 1 and 2 converge to true flow after the lumen is filled with color pixel. System 3 is nearly constant regarding gain and underestimates the flow by approximately 17%. Shown are mean flow estimated from 20 volumes, and the error bars show standard deviation. Image courtesy of the journal Radiology

News | Ultrasound Imaging | July 01, 2020
July 1, 2020 — A 3-D ultrasound
Researchers reviewed results of prostate biopsies on over 3,400 men who had targets identified on prostate MRI and found that the positive predictive value of the test for prostate cancer was highly variable at different sites
News | Prostate Cancer | July 01, 2020
July 1, 2020 — Prostate MRI is an emerging technology used to identify and guide treatment for...
R2* maps of healthy control participants and participants with Alzheimer disease. R2* maps are windowed between 10 and 50 sec21. Differences in iron concentration in basal ganglia are too small to allow visual separation between patients with Alzheimer disease and control participants, and iron levels strongly depend on anatomic structure and subject age. Image courtesy of Radiological Society of North America

R2* maps of healthy control participants and participants with Alzheimer disease. R2* maps are windowed between 10 and 50 sec21. Differences in iron concentration in basal ganglia are too small to allow visual separation between patients with Alzheimer disease and control participants, and iron levels strongly depend on anatomic structure and subject age. Image courtesy of Radiological Society of North America

News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | July 01, 2020
July 1, 2020 — Researchers using magnetic...
Imaging Artificial Intelligence (AI) provider Qure.ai announced its first US FDA 510(k) clearance for its head CT scan product qER. The US Food and Drug Administration's decision covers four critical abnormalities identified by Qure.ai's emergency room product.
News | Artificial Intelligence | June 30, 2020
June 30, 2020 — Imaging Artificial Intelligence (AI) provider Qure.ai announced its first US FDA 510(k) clearance for
In new QuickPoLL survey on imaging during the pandemic, responses were tallied from around 170 radiology administrators and business managers, who are part of an imagePRO panel created by The MarkeTech Group (TMTG), regarding the effects of COVID-19 on their business. TMTG is a research firm specializing in the medical device, healthcare and pharmaceutical industries.
Feature | Coronavirus (COVID-19) | June 30, 2020 | By Melinda Taschetta-Millane