Feature | March 03, 2015

VolparaAnalytics used to compare force, pressure, volumetric density and mammographic dose between U.S. and Dutch patient populations

Volpara, VolparaAnalytics, VolparaDensity, mammography, pressure, study

March 3, 2015 — Calculating and tracking mammographic compression pressure could help standardize mammography quality and patient experience, according to a study published in the European Jorunal of Radiology (EJR).

The study, “Mammographic compression — A need for mechanical standardization,” compared compression between sites in the Netherlands and the United States using VolparaAnalytics from Volpara Solutions. Factors measured and compared included average force, pressure, breast thickness, breast volume, volumetric breast density and average glandular dose.

According to researchers, the lack of consistent guidelines regarding mammographic compression has led to wide variation in its technical execution. Breast compression is accomplished by means of a compression paddle, resulting in a certain contact area between the paddle and the breast, which can result in varying levels of discomfort or pain. On current mammography systems, the only mechanical parameter available in estimating the degree of compression is the physical entity of force (daN). Recently, researchers have suggested that pressure (kPa), resulting from a specific force divided by contact area on a breast, might be a more appropriate parameter for standardization. For example, while a large breast requires more force to compress and a small breast requires less force, research suggests that optimal compression pressure should be similar for all breast sizes.

This study compared the current compression practice in mammography between two sites in the Netherlands and one in the United States, and investigated whether the compression protocols could be improved by standardization of pressure (kPa) as an objective parameter.  The Dutch dataset comprised 37,518 screening mammographic images (from 9,188 women) obtained from the Dutch national breast cancer screening program. The U.S. dataset comprised 7,171 screening and diagnostic mammographic images (from 1,851 women).

All images were analyzed using VolparaAnalytics and VolparaDensity software, so that the various factors could be compared between populations. Large variation in compression was observed for the Dutch and U.S. datasets, with relative standard deviations of 19.6 percent and 41.9 percent for force and 43.1 percent and 50.6 percent for pressure, respectively. Significant differences (p<0.001) were observed for the mean forces and pressures used in both the Dutch and U.S. datasets (i.e. 13.8 daN versus 7.4 daN and 13.7 kPa versus 8.1 kPa, respectively).  As a result of the lack of standardization, extreme pressures were observed in both datasets, resulting in an inability to predict the compression pressure for a given individual.

“Now that software like VolparaAnalytics—which enables device-independent cross-comparisons of key mammographic metrics between patient populations—has become available, we may be able to better standardize mammographic compression, which could decrease variation and improve reproducibility; minimize unnecessary pain; and reduce radiation dose and inadequate image quality.  I expect that this will enable the industry to enhance quality control of mammographic compression procedures and help maintain exam quality and patient comfort,” said Gerard J. den Heeten, LRCB Dutch Reference Center for Screening, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 

Cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), HealthCanada, the Therapeutic Goods Association (TGA) and CE-marked, VolparaDensity is in use at breast imaging centers worldwide to help radiologists objectively assess density from both digital mammography and tomosynthesis images, helping doctors evaluate who might benefit from additional screening. Highly correlated to breast magnetic resonance (MR) assessments, VolparaDensity automatically generates an objective measurement of volumetric breast density correlated to the American College of Radiology (ACR) breast density categories.

VolparaAnalytics is a centralized dashboard that produces configurable reports for management of quality assurance, resource utilization and breast imaging workflow. The software monitors critical elements of the breast imaging process and generates key metrics to help breast imaging centers identify and address potential issues early. VolparaDose provides a standardized measurement of patient-specific dose with consistent results across systems from different manufacturers.

For more information: www.volparasolutions.com


Related Content

News | Breast Imaging

July 7, 2026 — QT Imaging Holdings, Inc. recently announced it has successfully completed its first routine inspection ...

Time July 07, 2026
arrow
News | MRI Breast

July 2, 2026 – Quibim has announced the European and UK launch of QP-Breast, its CE and UKCA-marked AI tool which ...

Time July 02, 2026
arrow
News | Mammography

June 30, 2026 — The Food and Drug Administration has cleared new contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and CEM biopsy ...

Time June 30, 2026
arrow
News | Mammography

June 23, 2026 — Using artificial intelligence (AI), researchers found that image-based risk scores for breast cancer ...

Time June 24, 2026
arrow
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

June 9, 2026 — An investigator at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai has received international recognition for ...

Time June 15, 2026
arrow
News | Women's Health

June 2, 2026 — Results of an American College of Radiology-managed retrospective study involving 110,000 women presented ...

Time June 02, 2026
arrow
News | Ultrasound Imaging

May 26, 2026 — A soft, wearable ultrasound patch that can continuously monitor a fetus for hours at a time — and it can ...

Time May 27, 2026
arrow
News

May 21, 2026 – Artera, the developer of multimodal artificial intelligence (MMAI)-based prognostic and predictive cancer ...

Time May 22, 2026
arrow
News | FDA

May 6, 2026 — Artera, the developer of multimodal artificial intelligence (MMAI)-based prognostic and predictive cancer ...

Time May 07, 2026
arrow
News | X-Ray

April 29, 2026 — Results from a new study* presented at the American Roentgen Ray Society’s (ARRS) 2026 annual meeting ...

Time April 29, 2026
arrow
Subscribe Now