Feature | September 06, 2007 | Herman Oosterwijk

PARCA vs CIIP Certification

Key differences between PARCA and CIIP involve an emphasis on HL7 and DICOM

Herman Oosterwijk is a member of the PARCA advisory board as well as part of the Educational Advisory Network established by SIIM and on the Editorial Board of Imaging Technology News.

The ABBI organization recently conducted the first Certified Imaging Informatics Professional (CIIP) exam at the annual The Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM) meeting held in June in Providence, RI. The test content was published in the fall of 2006, so potential candidates had time and opportunity to prepare themselves.
Since the publication of the outline, many PACS SA professionals have tried to discern the key differences between the SIIM and PARCA certifications by the PACS Administrators Registry and Certification Association (PARCA)
to allow them to make an informed decision on whether to pursue either one
or both certifications. I would like to share my observations based on the discussions I have had with several SAs, in particular with those who have taken both certifications.
The fact that the CIIP certification has been established is yet another justification of the need for some type of validation of a PACS SA’s skills through certification.
The differences I personally observed are as follows:
1. Maturity: PARCA was established more than two years ago and has hundreds of members, many of whom are certified. It is not uncommon to see alumni using the CPSA, CPAS, and etc. titles and there are employment advertisements that specifically spell out the requirement for certified professionals. Training organizations have had the opportunity to align training programs and produce study guides for PARCA, while this is still in progress for CIIP.
2. Entry requirements: CIIP certification requires certain experience and skills that have to be obtained using a point system. PARCA does not have any prerequisites, but rather requires the candidates to prove their experience by way of an exam containing both clinical and IT skills.
3. Global reach: The fact that the PARCA exam can be taken online enables candidates to take this at any time, from any location. This allows for international, and U.S.-based candidates to be certified without having to travel on specific dates to centers which as of now are only located in the U.S.
4. Levels of certification: CIIP has only one level. PARCA has four different levels: an Associate, System Analyst, Interface Analyst and Manager level. Each level requires a separate exam.
5. Requirements: CIIP and PARCA are distinctly different in that CIIP appears to concentrate more on the “soft” skills. For example, the CIIP outline specifies the need to know about procurement, project management, training and education; subjects that are not addressed as part of PARCA. On the other hand, the subject of HL7 and to a lesser degree DICOM is barely mentioned, which is a major part of the PARCA CPIA certification. There is a definite overlap with regard to the clinical and IT requirements. However, it is clear that overall both certifications have a very different focus and emphasis.
6. Emphasis: PARCA is primarily focused on PACS, although not necessarily radiology only; whilst CIIP has made a conscious effort to address imaging at an enterprise level from the start.
It will be interesting to see in the near future how both PARCA and CIIP will develop: Will they come together, grow apart, or continue to address the certification needs of two different classes of professionals? Only time will tell.

Related Content

Technology | PACS Accessories | January 03, 2018
January 3, 2018 — medQ Inc. recently announced the launch of its Q/ris MIPS Reporting module.
News | Enterprise Imaging | December 21, 2017
Vital Images showcased enhancements to its enterprise imaging solutions at the Radiological Society of North America (...
Videos | Artificial Intelligence | December 21, 2017
ITN and DAIC Editor Dave Fornell shows several examples of how vendors are incorporating AI, deep learning algorithms
Medexprim's Radiomics Enabler Goes Open Source
Technology | PACS Accessories | December 06, 2017
December 6, 2017 — Medexprim announced its Radiomics Enabler, meant to enhance medical images archives for research,
How to allow legacy PACS systems to use a global worklist even with older, disparate PACS systems. Carestream.
Sponsored Content | Whitepapers | PACS | December 06, 2017
Myth: Legacy PACS systems in an M&A environment can not support a global worklist.
Ikonopedia and Konica Minolta Showcase Integrated Breast Imaging Workflow and Reporting at RSNA
News | Breast Imaging | December 05, 2017
Ikonopedia and Konica Minolta Healthcare Americas Inc. showcased integrated breast imaging workflow and reporting at...
Ambra Health Joins Google Cloud Technology Partner Program
News | PACS Accessories | December 05, 2017
December 4, 2017 — Ambra Health recently announced a new relationship with Google Cloud.
Fujifilm Introduces Artificial Intelligence Initiative for U.S. Market at RSNA 2017
News | Artificial Intelligence | December 04, 2017
December 4, 2017 — Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A. Inc.
ScImage Announces PicomPassport
Technology | PACS Accessories | November 30, 2017
ScImage Inc. introduced PicomPassport at the Radiological Society of North America’s 103rd Annual Scientific Assembly,...
Philips Introduces IntelliSpace Enterprise Edition for Radiology
News | Enterprise Imaging | November 30, 2017
November 29, 2017 — Philips announced the introduction of IntelliSpace Enterprise Edition for Radiology, its comprehe
Overlay Init