Feature | September 06, 2007 | Herman Oosterwijk

PARCA vs CIIP Certification

Key differences between PARCA and CIIP involve an emphasis on HL7 and DICOM

Herman Oosterwijk is a member of the PARCA advisory board as well as part of the Educational Advisory Network established by SIIM and on the Editorial Board of Imaging Technology News.

The ABBI organization recently conducted the first Certified Imaging Informatics Professional (CIIP) exam at the annual The Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM) meeting held in June in Providence, RI. The test content was published in the fall of 2006, so potential candidates had time and opportunity to prepare themselves.
Since the publication of the outline, many PACS SA professionals have tried to discern the key differences between the SIIM and PARCA certifications by the PACS Administrators Registry and Certification Association (PARCA)
to allow them to make an informed decision on whether to pursue either one
or both certifications. I would like to share my observations based on the discussions I have had with several SAs, in particular with those who have taken both certifications.
The fact that the CIIP certification has been established is yet another justification of the need for some type of validation of a PACS SA’s skills through certification.
The differences I personally observed are as follows:
1. Maturity: PARCA was established more than two years ago and has hundreds of members, many of whom are certified. It is not uncommon to see alumni using the CPSA, CPAS, and etc. titles and there are employment advertisements that specifically spell out the requirement for certified professionals. Training organizations have had the opportunity to align training programs and produce study guides for PARCA, while this is still in progress for CIIP.
2. Entry requirements: CIIP certification requires certain experience and skills that have to be obtained using a point system. PARCA does not have any prerequisites, but rather requires the candidates to prove their experience by way of an exam containing both clinical and IT skills.
3. Global reach: The fact that the PARCA exam can be taken online enables candidates to take this at any time, from any location. This allows for international, and U.S.-based candidates to be certified without having to travel on specific dates to centers which as of now are only located in the U.S.
4. Levels of certification: CIIP has only one level. PARCA has four different levels: an Associate, System Analyst, Interface Analyst and Manager level. Each level requires a separate exam.
5. Requirements: CIIP and PARCA are distinctly different in that CIIP appears to concentrate more on the “soft” skills. For example, the CIIP outline specifies the need to know about procurement, project management, training and education; subjects that are not addressed as part of PARCA. On the other hand, the subject of HL7 and to a lesser degree DICOM is barely mentioned, which is a major part of the PARCA CPIA certification. There is a definite overlap with regard to the clinical and IT requirements. However, it is clear that overall both certifications have a very different focus and emphasis.
6. Emphasis: PARCA is primarily focused on PACS, although not necessarily radiology only; whilst CIIP has made a conscious effort to address imaging at an enterprise level from the start.
It will be interesting to see in the near future how both PARCA and CIIP will develop: Will they come together, grow apart, or continue to address the certification needs of two different classes of professionals? Only time will tell.

Related Content

ScImage Awarded U.S. Government DIN-PACS IV Contract
News | PACS | August 16, 2017
ScImage Inc. was recently awarded a new DIN-PACS IV (Digital Imaging Network/Picture Archiving and Communications...
Neighbors Emergency Center Selects Novarad PACS/RIS
News | PACS | August 15, 2017
August 15, 2017 — Novarad Corp.
Fujifilm Launches Synapse PACS Version 5
Technology | PACS | August 03, 2017
August 3, 2017 – Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A. Inc.
RamSoft has teamed up with Availity to bring healthcare providers Patient Access and Patient Authorizations
News | PACS | July 31, 2017
RamSoft has teamed up with Availity to bring healthcare providers Patient Access and Patient Authorizations, two fully...
Agfa Receives FDA 510(k) for Xtend Functionalities on Xero Universal Viewer
Technology | Remote Viewing Systems | July 27, 2017
Agfa HealthCare announced it has received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 510(k) clearance for the Xero Xtend...
Philips Receives FDA 510(k) Clearance for IntelliSpace Portal 9.0
Technology | Advanced Visualization | June 29, 2017
Philips announced it has received 510(k) clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to market...
Envision Diagnostic Center Deploys Exa PACS Across 11 Facilities
News | Enterprise Imaging | June 28, 2017
Envision Diagnostic Center (Novi, Mich.) has implemented Exa PACS (picture archiving and communication system) from...
Fujifilm's Synapse PACS Granted Authority to Operate Under New U.S. DoD Process
News | PACS | June 26, 2017
June 26, 2017 — Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A. Inc.
News | PACS | June 23, 2017
Medidata and Median Technologies announced a new collaboration to streamline the growth and use of medical imaging in...
RamSoft Partners With Gamel to Enhance Patient Care in Peruvian Market
News | PACS | June 23, 2017
RamSoft announced a new partnership with Peru-based medical imaging equipment provider, Gamel. With RamSoft’s...
Overlay Init