Greg Freiherr, Industry Consultant
Greg Freiherr, Industry Consultant

Greg Freiherr has reported on developments in radiology since 1983. He runs the consulting service, The Freiherr Group.

Blog | Greg Freiherr, Industry Consultant | Radiology Imaging| October 19, 2016

How Imaging Could Change Medical Ethics

imaging, medical ethics

Image courtesy of Pixabay

To tell or not to tell? That is the question. It has been asked — and gone unasked — for decades, tracing back to the profoundly improved resolution coming from next generation medical imaging equipment. Spurred by digital sonograms and submillimeter-resolution CTs and MRIs, physicians have questioned whether what they see is really disease. Are abnormalities benign — or are they the early signs of disease that need immediate attention?

Most concerning are incidental findings that appear after a cause of symptoms has been locked down. Should they be acted upon? Should more tests be performed? And at what costs? Patient discomfort, inconvenience, even pain might result. Expenses are sure to mount. And to what end?

Documenting every abnormality from every possible angle has been acceptable to our traditional cost-based, reimbursement system. But what about in the future? Under value-based medicine?

Putting money aside, what about the patient? Precedent already exists for keeping patients in the dark, if they so choose, when it comes to their genetic predisposition to disease. Why can’t radiology provide the same kind of buffer from findings that patients don’t want to know about, especially if those findings are incidental, said radiologist Stella Kang at the NYU School of Medicine in New York City. 

Kang and colleagues point out in their paper that low-risk incidental findings have the potential to drive unnecessary testing and over-treatment with financial, psychological and clinical consequences. The challenge for radiologists, they wrote, is to produce guidelines for handling low-risk incidental findings “for which adverse consequences are unlikely but associated with substantial uncertainty because of the lack of strong evidence on which to base the recommendations.” 

A hierarchy of questions characterizes this issue: Should radiologists lead medicine into a new world where the individual wishes of the patient take precedence? Should they push for the development of guidelines that at least consider the wishes of patients? When crafting these guidelines, how much weight should be given to patient preferences and to clinical data?

It is difficult for patients to be objective in emotional times. Presented with suspicious findings — possible lung nodules or a small kidney tumor — who would say “no” to testing that promises additional, possibly life-saving information. What responsibility do physicians have in guiding the patient in these difficult times?

 

Outcome Research … To the Rescue?

Radiology stands today at a crossroads between serving the patient and lowering costs.  The ideal is to find the right answers with fewer tests and lower costs. The magic bullets for doing so are possible, at least theoretically. Their construction may be based on outcomes research and data mining.

Getting this information will require planning. Broadly based clinical data must be recorded in structured forms so they can be efficiently gathered. Radiology is already moving in this direction through structured reporting. The key will be for those developing data mining tools and those recording the data to buy into common goals. This may be easier said than done.

The greatest amount of data is generated daily as part of routine scanning. This is the database that might provide the most useful information to the practicing radiologist. But, just as these data promise to be most effective, so they may be the most difficult to capture, particularly when mainstream radiologists are pressed to do more in less time. Who has the time to record data according to a preset format? What IT department has the time to set up the data collection scheme? Who will do the actual data mining? And who will draw the conclusions and on what basis?

 

Patient Preferences Matter

Kang and co-authors stated in their paper that the development of guidelines will require “better gauging of patient attitudes and preferences regarding low-risk incidental findings and using patient preferences to inform recommendations for low-risk findings.” When patients prefer strongly not to know about — or act upon — low-risk incidental findings, radiologists and the physicians with whom they work must decide whether to respect those preferences. It will be an unprecedented balancing act and a critically important one to do.

At no time in the history of modern medicine have the stakes been higher. Medical institutions are beginning to creak under the weight of aging populations. And America is only going to get older. The analysis of big data could offer previously elusive insights into the value of imaging.

But it may be the patient’s preference — to know about and act on findings — that makes the difference.

 

Editor's note: This is the third blog in a four-part series on State-of-the-art Radiology. The first blog, "When Will the Greatest Trend in Radiology Happen?" can be found here. The second blog, “The Promise Ahead for Radiology,” can be found here.

Related Content

Turkish Hospital Begins MR-Guided Radiation Therapy With Viewray MRIdian Linac
News | Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) | September 21, 2018
ViewRay Inc. announced that Acibadem Maslak Hospital in Istanbul, Turkey has begun treating patients with ViewRay's...
Machine Learning IDs Markers to Help Predict Alzheimer's

Neurologists use structural and diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify changes in brain tissue (both gray and white matter) that are characteristic of Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia. The MRI images are analyzed using morphometry and tractography techniques, which detect changes in the shape and dimensions of the brain and in the tissue microstructure, respectively. In this example, the images show the normal brain of an elderly patient. Image courtesy of Jiook Cha.

News | Neuro Imaging | September 20, 2018
New research has shown a combination of two different modes of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computer-based...
SimonMed Deploys ClearRead CT Enterprise Wide
News | Computer-Aided Detection Software | September 17, 2018
September 17, 2018 — National outpatient physician radiology group SimonMed Imaging has selected Riverain Technologie
Siemens Healthineers Announces First U.S. Install of Somatom go.Top CT
News | Computed Tomography (CT) | September 17, 2018
September 17, 2018 — The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center in Columbus recently became the first healthcare
Ingenia Ambition X 1.5T MR. This innovation is the latest advance in the Ingenia MRI portfolio, which comprises fully-digital MRI systems, healthcare informatics and a range of maintenance and life cycle services for integrated solutions that empower a faster, smarter, and simpler path to enabling a confident diagnosis
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | September 14, 2018
Philips, a global leader in health technology, launched the Ingenia Ambition X 1.5T MR.
Veye Chest version 2
News | Lung Cancer | September 11, 2018
Aidence, an Amsterdam-based medical AI company, announced that Veye Chest version 2, a class IIa medical device, has
Videos | Radiation Therapy | September 07, 2018
A discussion with Ehsan Samei, Ph.D., DABR, FAAPM, FSPIE, director of the Duke University Clinical Imaging Physics Gr
Sponsored Content | Case Study | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | September 07, 2018 | By Sabine Sartoretti, M.D.
As soon as the Compressed SENSE technology became available to the MRI team at Kantonsspital Winterthur (Switzerland),...
The CT scanner might not come with protocols that are adequate for each hospital situation, so at Phoenix Children’s Hospital they designed their own protocols, said Dianna Bardo, M.D., director of body MR and co-director of the 3D Innovation Lab at Phoenix Children’s.

The CT scanner might not come with protocols that are adequate for each hospital situation, so at Phoenix Children’s Hospital they designed their own protocols, said Dianna Bardo, M.D., director of body MR and co-director of the 3D Innovation Lab at Phoenix Children’s.

Sponsored Content | Case Study | Radiation Dose Management | September 07, 2018
Radiation dose management is central to child patient safety. Medical imaging plays an increasing role in the accurate...
Carestream Releases Second-Generation Metal Artifact Reduction Software for OnSight 3D Extremity System
Technology | Computed Tomography (CT) | September 06, 2018
Carestream Health has started shipping a new software version for its Carestream OnSight 3D Extremity System that...