Feature | Breast Imaging | January 30, 2019 | By Jeff Zagoudis

Technologies to Watch in Breast Imaging

Rising prevalence of breast cancer and other chronic breast diseases, as well as more new technological innovations, will keep this technology on the forefront

Traditional mammography continues to be the gold standard for breast cancer screening technologies. However, use of 3-D breast tomosynthesis is growing rapidly.

Traditional mammography continues to be the gold standard for breast cancer screening technologies. However, use of 3-D breast tomosynthesis is growing rapidly.

Breast Imaging Sectra

Image courtesy of Sectra

The importance of early detection of breast cancer has been underscored in recent years as the breast health community learns more about breast density and risk models, turning toward personalized medicine. As this knowledge base expands, healthcare professionals are exploring the benefits of different imaging technologies to improve detection and save lives.

 

Mammography

Mammography continues to be the gold standard for breast cancer screening technologies, but recent discussions have debated how often women should be screened and/or the need for supplemental imaging.

In 2016, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) released controversial new recommendations for mammography screening practices. In addition to suggesting biennial screening is sufficient for women in their 40s — going against conventional wisdom — the task force posited the balance of benefits versus harms for mammography screening in women over age 75 was inconclusive.

A large study presented at the 2018 Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) annual meeting in November suggests that women over 75 do benefit from continuing screening, depending on their circumstances, due to a high incidence of breast cancer. The study, from Elizabeth Wende Breast Care in Rochester, N.Y., looked at more than 750,000 mammography exams performed between 2007 and 2017. A subset analysis of nearly 77,000 patients age 75 and older found a total of 645 malignancies in 616 patients for a cancer rate of 8.4 detections per 1,000 exams in this age group. The cancer rate for the entire patient cohort was only 5 detections per 1,000.

“We think it’s very important for women in their 70s to understand there is still benefit to annual screening mammography,” said Stamatia Destounis, M.D. “Right now in the United States, a 75-year-old woman may live another 10 years. If you’re in good enough health to be able to take care of your family and go to work and everything else, you can come in and have a screening mammogram that takes a few minutes.”

Destounis also noted that cancers found in the older age group were predominantly invasive (7 percent lymph node metastasis rate), evaluated as grade 2-3 lesions. You can watch a video, “Women Benefit From Mammography Screening Beyond Age 75,” with Destounis at https://bit.ly/2R7swTR.

One of the main reasons breast cancer screening has shifted to a more personalized approach in recent years is the further understanding of the role of fibroglandular breast density in masking cancer. On a conventional 2-D mammogram, both dense tissue and cancerous tissue appear white, making the cancer mammographically occult.

Quantitative assessment of breast density can improve cancer detection rates, as seen in an RSNA 2018 study. The case-control study of 1,204 U.K. women ages 50-74 assessed breast density using a visual analog scale of 0 to 100, BI-RADS 5th Edition density categories and fibroglandular volume (FGV) calculated by Volpara software. Study results showed that FGV predicted both screen-detected and interval cancers. The other methods predicted interval cancers but not screen-detected cancers.

 

Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography

Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM), or contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM), has provided an alternative to traditional mammography since 2011 when the first CESM system was approved for the U.S. market. Contrast dye injected into the breast is often taken up by lesions, making them easier to spot.

A study presented at RSNA 2018 demonstrated that CEDM can help safely reduce the number of benign breast biopsies, which can cause physical pain and stress for patients. Under the current (5th) edition of the American College of Radiology’s Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), if a detected lesion is classified as BI-RADS 4 or 5, a biopsy is recommended. An estimated 20-25 percent of BI-RADS 4 suspicious lesions do not turn out to be malignancies, however, making biopsies universal is not ideal at this level.

The study looked at 57 women (ages 34-74) with 60 BI-RADS 4A or 4B soft tissue lesions scheduled for ultrasound, stereotactic or tomosynthesis directed biopsy, and CEDM was performed immediately prior to biopsy. Four MQSA-qualified radiologists provided 3 BI-RADS scores for each lesion: mammography/digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) only, with ultrasound added and with CEDM added.

Prior to CEDM, 72 percent of the ratings were classified as BI-RADS 4; after CEDM, 60 out of 240 total ratings were reclassified as less than BI-RADS 3.

 

Breast Ultrasound

For women with dense fibroglandular breast tissue, masking increases the likelihood that cancers could be missed on a mammogram. Ultrasound has offered an alternative, found to detect some 30 percent of cancers missed on mammography.

While breast ultrasound has proven effective in the short-term, little is known about its long-term performance. Destounis presented a second study at RSNA 2018 that tracked the performance of screening breast ultrasound over a five-year period at her clinic in New York.

The retrospective study assessed data from 23,878 screening ultrasound exams performed between 2013 and 2017 in patients with heterogeneously dense or extremely dense breasts. Destounis and her team were interested in the cancer detection rate (CDR), positive predictive value (PPV) and biopsy rate for lesions detected with ultrasound only.

Cancer detection rate did increase over the first three years of the study, from 1.4 cancers per 1,000 to 3.6 per 1,000, then decreased in 2016 and 2017 to 2.4/1,000 and 2.2/1,000, respectively. It should be noted that use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) increased dramatically in the study population over the five-year period, from 18.7 percent in 2013 to 99.3 percent in 2017. The research team suspects that the improved detection provided by DBT may have led to the decline in ultrasound-only detected lesions in subsequent years.

The biopsy rate did decrease steadily over the five-year period, from 2.9 percent to 1 percent in 2017. PPV for biopsy fluctuated in the study period, jumping 15 percent in the first year, declining slightly over the following two years, then increasing again in the final year, ultimately rising from 5 percent to 22.3 percent. This suggests that biopsies were employed more efficiently over the course of the five-year period.

 

Related Content:

VIDEO: Women Benefit From Mammography Screening Beyond Age 75

VIDEO: How Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Will Impact Breast Imaging

Related Content

Category A

Category A

Feature | Breast Density | April 03, 2020 | By Dayna Williams M.D., Shivani Chaudhry, M.D., and Laurie R. Margolies, M.D.
Breast cancer is the most common cance
An example of Philips’ TrueVue technology, which offers photo-realistic rendering and the ability to change the location of the lighting source on 3-D ultrasound images. In this example of two Amplazer transcatheter septal occluder devices in the heart, the operator demonstrating the product was able to push the lighting source behind the devices into the other chamber of the heart. This illuminated a hole that was still present that the occluders did not seal.

An example of Philips’ TrueVue technology, which offers photo-realistic rendering and the ability to change the location of the lighting source on 3-D ultrasound images. In this example of two Amplazer transcatheter septal occluder devices in the heart, the operator demonstrating the product was able to push the lighting source behind the devices into the other chamber of the heart. This illuminated a hole that was still present that the occluders did not seal. Photo by Dave Fornell

Feature | Radiology Imaging | April 02, 2020 | By Katie Caron
A new year — and decade — offers the opportunity to reflect on the advancements and challenges of years gone by and p
#COVID19 #Coronavirus #2019nCoV #Wuhanvirus #SARScov2 A brief article from Henry Ford Health System in Detroit, published today in Radiology, reports on the first presumptive case of COVID-19–associated acute necrotizing hemorrhagic encephalopathy.

A, Image from noncontrast head CT demonstrates symmetric hypoattenuation within the bilateral medial thalami (arrows). B, Axial CT venogram demonstrates patency of the cerebral venous vasculature, including the internal cerebral veins (arrows). C, Coronal reformat of aCT angiogram demonstrates normal appearance of the basilar artery and proximal posterior cerebral arteries. Image courtesy of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)

News | Coronavirus (COVID-19) | March 31, 2020
March 31, 2020 — A brief article fr
RSNA's open data repository will compile images and correlative data to create a comprehensive source for COVID-19 research and education efforts #COVID19 #Coronavirus #2019nCoV #Wuhanvirus #SARScov2
News | Coronavirus (COVID-19) | March 30, 2020
March 30, 2020 — The medical imaging community around the world is uniting to help address the...
#COVID19 #Coronavirus #2019nCoV #Wuhanvirus #SARScov2

Typical CT imaging features for COVID-19. Unenhanced, thin-section axial images of the lungs in a 52-year-old man with a positive RT-PCR (A-D) show bilateral, multifocal rounded (asterisks) and peripheral GGO (arrows) with superimposed interlobular septal thickening and visible intralobular lines (“crazy-paving”). Routine screening CT for diagnosis or exclusion of COVID-19 is currently not recommended by most professional organizations or the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Image courtesy of RSNA

News | Coronavirus (COVID-19) | March 26, 2020
March 26, 2020 — The Radiological Society of North America (RSNA
#COVID19 #Coronavirus #2019nCoV #Wuhanvirus #SARScov2
News | Mammography | March 25, 2020
March 25, 2020 — The...
#COVID19 #Coronavirus #2019nCoV #Wuhanvirus #SARScov2

Representative examples of the attention heatmaps generated using Grad-CAM method for (a) COVID-19, (b) CAP, and (c) Non-Pneumonia. The heatmaps are standard Jet colormap and overlapped on the original image, the red color highlights the activation region associated with the predicted class. COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019, CAP = community acquired pneumonia. Image courtesy of the journal Radiology

News | Coronavirus (COVID-19) | March 20, 2020
March 20, 2020 — An arti...
#COVID19 #Coronavirus #2019nCoV #Wuhanvirus #SARScov2

Series CT scans in 35-year-old woman with COVID-19 pneumonia. (a) Scan obtained on illness days 1 showed multiple pure ground-glass opacity (GGO) mainly in right lower lobe. (b) Scan obtained on illness days 5 showed increased extent of GGO and early consolidation. (c) Scan obtained on illness days 11 showed multiple consolidation with almost the same extent. (d) Scan obtained on illness days 15 showed a mixed pattern with a slightly smaller extent, and the perilobular consolidation might suggest the presence of organizing pneumonia. The patient was discharged on illness days 17. Image courtesy of the journal Radiology

News | Coronavirus (COVID-19) | March 20, 2020
March 20, 2020 — In a new study pub
#COVID19 #Coronavirus #2019nCoV #Wuhanvirus #SBI20

Image courtesy of Getty Images

News | Coronavirus (COVID-19) | March 17, 2020
March 17, 2020 — The journal Radiology ...