Feature | Treatment Planning | July 03, 2018 | By Jeff Zagoudis

Automated Treatment Planning System Streamlines Workflow

This article originally ran as an introduction to the Treatment Planning Systems comparison chart in the July/August 2018 issue. 

 JoVE_Radiation_Planning_Assistant_schematic

A new software developed and recently tested at the MD Anderson Cancer Center demonstrated the ability to largely automate the entire workflow of radiotherapy treatment planning. Such a system may offer a solution to a looming shortage of qualified radiation oncology professionals identified by the research team.

As the incidence of cancer continues to rise worldwide, the demand for radiation therapy services is expected to increase, naturally requiring more radiation oncology staff. A 2014 study found that these staffing demands will be a challenge to meet, particularly for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The study projects that worldwide, an additional 12,000 radiation oncologists, 10,000 medical physicists and 29,000 technologists will be needed by 2020.1 The MD Anderson research team believes that an automated system like the one they designed could help mitigate some of these projected staffing deficiencies.

The system, dubbed the Radiation Planning Assistant (RPA), works in tandem with MD Anderson’s existing treatment planning system (Varian Eclipse) and secondary dose verification software (Mobius 3D). All that is needed to start the automated treatment planning process is a treatment plan order approved by the radiation oncologist and a computed tomography (CT) simulation image of the treatment area, approved by the CT technician. The treatment plan order contains all of the relevant information needed to create the plan — basic patient information, prescription, treatment type, etc.

Currently the RPA has only been tested for two specific treatment delivery/cancer site combinations:

•    Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for head and neck cancers; and

•    Four-field box plans for patients with cervical cancer.

 

Once the inputs have been approved, the RPA begins automatic plan generation, beginning with contouring. This is the only portion that may require human intervention, depending on the treatment type. For head and neck cancer plans, the radiation oncologist must approve the initial target and normal tissue delineation from the CT image; the contours can be edited if necessary. The RO also delineates the gross tumor volume (GTV) manually at this point. No human intervention is required during cervical cancer treatment planning.

On average, the research team found that head/neck VMAT plans were completed in 46 minutes (for a 2-arc plan), while the 4-field box treatment cervical cancer plans took just 21 minutes. Review of the latter group by an experienced radiation oncologist found that 90-96 percent of the field boxes were clinically appropriate.

Review of the final plans is arguably the most important area of human intervention in the RPA process. The team at MD Anderson designed an illustrated procedure guide for users to check:

•    Marked isocenter and body contour identification;

•    Patient orientation, laterality and treatment site;

•    Field apertures (for 4-field box plans); and

•    Presence of image or dose calculation artifacts.

 

A library of case images was created for each portion of the check guide that plan reviewers can use for reference.

To assess the usability of the RPA, the research team had four non-clinical staff (aka those with limited radiotherapy experience) review a series of 16 cervical cancer plan documents — 12 of which contained intentional errors. The volunteers were able to find all errors related to body contouring, isocenter and dose calculation artifacts. However, they could not identify the one 4-field plan that contained only three fields, nor could they identify small errors in the field apertures. This assessment demonstrated that some plan review work can be assigned to non-specialized staff, but that final review should still be conducted by the radiation oncologists and the physicists.

The study authors eventually hope the RPA will be able to generate treatment plans for all cancer sites and treatment modalities.

 

Reference

1. Datta N.R., Samiei M., Bodis S. Radiation therapy infrastructure and
    human resources in low- and middle-income countries: present
    status and projections for 2020
, International Journal of
    Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, July 1, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.03.002

Related Content

Varian received FDA clearance for its Ethos therapy in February 2020. It is an adaptive intelligence solution that uses onboard AI in the treatment system to take the cone beam CT imaging on the system, compare it to the treatment plan and deliver an entire adaptive treatment plan in a typical 15-minute treatment time slot, from patient setup through treatment delivery.

Varian received FDA clearance for its Ethos therapy in February 2020, shown here displayed for the first time at ASTRO 2019. It is an adaptive intelligence solution that uses onboard AI in the treatment system to take the cone beam CT imaging on the system, compare it to the treatment plan and deliver an entire adaptive treatment plan in a typical 15-minute treatment time slot, from patient setup through treatment delivery.

Feature | Treatment Planning | April 03, 2020 | Dave Fornell, Editor
The traditional treatment planning process takes days to create an optimized radiation therapy delivery plan, but new
MD Anderson and Varian Partner to Optimize Radiation Oncology Treatment
News | Treatment Planning | October 18, 2019
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and Varian announced a new strategic collaboration to develop an...
First Patients Treated With Machine Learning-generated Plans from RayStation 8B
News | Treatment Planning | September 23, 2019
The first-ever patient radiation therapy treatments generated with machine learning in the RayStation treatment...
The Siemens Somatom Go.Sim computed tomography (CT) system for dedicated radiation therapy planning

The Siemens Somatom Go.Sim computed tomography (CT) system for dedicated radiation therapy planning. Image courtesy of Siemens Healthineers.

News | Computed Tomography (CT) | September 15, 2019
Siemens Healthineers debuted two computed tomography (CT) systems dedicated to radiation therapy (RT) planning at the...
Philips Showcases Integrated Radiation Oncology Portfolio at ASTRO 2019
News | Radiation Oncology | September 13, 2019
Philips will showcase its integrated radiation oncology portfolio at the American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO...
First Clinical Monte Carlo Photon Dose Planning Conducted in RayStation
News | Treatment Planning | September 05, 2019
Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany, has treated its first patient using Monte Carlo photon dose planning in...
Heidelberg University Hospital Treats First Patient Using Carbon Ion Therapy With RayStation
News | Treatment Planning | August 23, 2019
Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany, has started using the RayStation treatment planning system for carbon ion...
The Zap-X stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) brain radiotherapy system is completely self-shielded, eliminating the need for a concrete vault. The goal of the system is to expand SRS brain therapy by making it easier to access and less expensive by eliminating the large expense of custom built vaults to house the system. #AAPM19 #AAPM2019 #AAPM

The Zap-X stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) brain radiotherapy system is completely self-shielded, eliminating the need for a concrete vault. The goal of the system is to expand SRS brain therapy by making it easier to access and less expensive by eliminating the large expense of custom-built vaults to house the system. 

Feature | AAPM | August 21, 2019 | Dave Fornell, Editor
There were several trends and new technologies in radiation oncology discussed at the ...