Greg Freiherr, Industry Consultant

Greg Freiherr has reported on developments in radiology since 1983. He runs the consulting service, The Freiherr Group.

Blog | Greg Freiherr, Industry Consultant | February 16, 2012

Radiology and the First Stage of Grief

Eastman Kodak was slain by its own sword. But it was pride that drove the blade, fueled by the mistaken belief that it could single-handedly hold back digital technology. Radiology may be facing the same kind of dilemma. 

For decades, radiology has labored literally in the shadows of medicine, interpreting images from reading rooms where clinicians seldom called and patients never ventured. In the early years, digital technology made medical imaging even more a domain onto radiologists. Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) collected vast numbers of images and, because they were under the control of radiologists, these PACS funneled those images only to radiologists. Then the technology underlying PACS and digital imaging turned fickle, at least to its erstwhile protagonists.

Networks began to spread throughout and beyond the enterprise. Effort-saving algorithms sprung up to expertly fine-tune images. And, suddenly, the subtle indicators of disease seen only by radiologists who knew where to look were obvious to clinicians. Making matters worse,  just then, the images containing those indicators of disease were getting easier and easier to get hold of and not just by radiologists.

Soon computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images might be routinely viewed on smart phones and tablets. The question then will arise, if radiologists only interpret images, and clinicians – rightly or wrongly -- believe they can do the same, what role will radiologists have in modern medicine? The answer will depend on what radiologists do in the next few years.

Specialties from outside radiology routinely tread on radiological turf. Some have even taken up shop there. Ultrasound has been a multidisciplinary modality for decades. A few neurology practices own their own MRs. Orthopedic surgeons make up the primary market for mini C-arms. Need I mention cardiac cath and vascular surgery? The fact is, radiology has been under attack from self-referrers for what seems like forever. What’s different now is that the attack is gathering steam and there are signs it could go viral.

The walls that once separated medical disciplines are coming down. ICUs house patients suffering from all kinds of maladies. Interventionalists are sidling up to surgeons in “hybrid ORs.” Bill Murray captured the sentiment best in Ghostbusters, when he said: “Riots in the streets, dogs and cats living together, mass hysteria!”

Denial is not going to cut it. If radiology is to survive, it must evolve. Fortunately, there seems no end to the possibilities. It has been suggested that radiology might seek an accommodation with referring physicians. Leveraging a kind of “if you can’t beat’em, join ‘em” approach, radiologists might synch up as subspecialty partners, a process that arguably has already begun vis-à-vis neuroradiologists/neurologists, for example, and pediatric radiologists/pediatricians.

Alternatively, they might join interdisciplinary teams of physicians, expanding their repertoire from interpreting images to managing patients. As experts in the field of radiology, they might even become advocates of evidence-based radiology, collecting and analyzing data relevant to the most appropriate use of imaging technology to gain improved patient outcomes.

As Kodak begins its journey through bankruptcy, it’s clear that the once-proud company held on too long. Grasping as it did to the knot at the end of the rope only made its end harder to bear.

Radiology can avoid an unhappy ending. But to do so, it must embrace change as tightly as it has embraced the technology that is causing that change.

Related Content

SIIM Announces Keynote Speakers for Conference on Machine Intelligence in Medical Imaging
News | Artificial Intelligence | September 21, 2017
The Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM) recently announced several corporate and government experts as...
Toshiba Showcases MRI Workflow Enhancements at RSNA 2017
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | September 21, 2017
September 21, 2017 — Toshiba Medical will highlight its latest...
Agfa HealthCare Celebrates 150 Years at RSNA 2017
News | Enterprise Imaging | September 20, 2017
Agfa Healthcare announced that its exhibition at the 2017 Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) annual meeting...
Philips Introduces New OB/GYN Ultrasound Innovations at ISUOG 2017. Vivian Fornell
News | Ultrasound Womens Healthcare | September 19, 2017
September 19, 2017 — Philips announced new OB/GYN innovations at the 27th World Congress on Ultrasound in Obstetrics
News | Imaging | September 18, 2017
Mary Washington Hospital and Union Health-Union Hospital will both receive Safety FiRsT grants to implement safety...
Siemens Healthineers to Showcase Magentom Vida MRI at RSNA 2017
Technology | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | September 18, 2017
September 18, 2017 — Siemens Healthineers announced it will display the new Magnetom Vida 3T...
Understanding True Patient-centered Care in Radiology
Sponsored Content | Whitepapers | Imaging | September 18, 2017
What is the true meaning of “patient-centered care”?
Toshiba Highlights Latest CT Advancements at RSNA 2017
News | Computed Tomography (CT) | September 18, 2017
Toshiba Medical announced that it will display several new enhancements to its existing computed tomography (CT)...
Hitachi Supria True64 CT Receives FDA Clearance
Technology | Computed Tomography (CT) | September 15, 2017
September 15, 2017 — Hitachi Healthcare Americas Inc. announced it has attained U.S.
Matrix Analytics Beginning Validation of Deep Learning Lung CT Tools
News | Lung Cancer | September 13, 2017
Matrix Analytics announced it will clinically validate its LungDirect deep learning and predictive analytics tools for...
Overlay Init