Greg Freiherr, Industry Consultant
Greg Freiherr, Industry Consultant

Greg Freiherr has reported on developments in radiology since 1983. He runs the consulting service, The Freiherr Group.

Blog | Greg Freiherr, Industry Consultant | May 04, 2015

Detectors Versus Tubes: CT Vendors Prepare for Battle

Detectors Versus Tubes: CT Vendors Prepare for Battle

A dual-energy CT shows perfused blood volume in a patient suspected of pulmonary embolism. First proposed 40 years ago, selective energy CT is finally beginning to have a clinical impact through products that either transmit dual-energy CT beams or ones that detect the different energies of photons in a conventional beam.

A battle is taking shape in computed tomography (CT), one that pits the tubes that deliver X-rays against the detectors that record them. It is a fight over how to use X-rays of different energies — variations on the decades-old concept of selective energy CT (SECT), which promise to make diagnoses more accurate and patient management more effective. 

In a sense, it is radiology’s version of the matchup between Blu-ray and HD DVD a decade ago. Vendors are squaring off much like Microsoft and Sony did in 2005 with Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3. And the outcome may be similar. 

On the exhibit floors of trade shows and in presentations by luminaries, CT’s big three are promoting their own brands of SECT. Siemens offers two products, each of which delivers dual-energy CT. One is built around a single X-ray tube, which uses rapid kVp switching technology to alternate the X-ray tube between two distinctive energies. The other has two X-ray tubes, arranged perpendicular to each other, delivering X-rays at different energies.

GE and Philips are proponents of spectral CT. Rather than delivering two X-ray beams at different energies, they have focused on the detector. Their products fire conventional X-ray beams into detectors that record the different energies of photons included in these beams.

Whether one approach is better than the other is anything but clear. Theoretically, said Hugo Bouchard, Ph.D., senior research scientist at the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) in the United Kingdom, the detector-based approach should have an advantage. Spectral imaging, he noted, is not limited to two energies. “But no one has yet shown the benefits of one energy-selective CT method over the other,” he said, “likely because the technologies are too recent.”

Although SECT was proposed in the 1970s, the technology was not commercially available until less than a decade ago, according to Bouchard. The first peer reviewed clinical results were published in 2006. Since then, clinical research has uncovered a range of potential applications.  

Dual-energy and spectral CT may distinguish more effectively than conventional CT tissues of different types, as well as urinary stones of differing chemical composition; enhance stroke evaluation through the improved detection of brain infarcts; help uncover lung cancer lesions by improving contrast-to-noise ratio, overall image quality and tumor delineation; identify calcium-based plaques, even in the presence of iodinated contrast agents; and even reduce artifacts due to beam hardening. Selective energy CT also may, in some instances, reduce radiation dose to patients by reconstructing a “virtual non-contrast CT image” from the contrast-enhanced image by filtering out the iodine in the contrast medium, thereby eliminating the need for a second CT scan. 

Bouchard noted that two energies “could be sufficient for our current clinical needs.” If so, spectral CT and its ability to discriminate photons at several energies would offer only “marginal benefit,” he said. Spectral CT may be limiting itself, in this regard. GE describes its approach as “dual-energy spectral CT,” made possible by its detector using “rapid kV switching to acquire the dual-energy samples.” And Philips uses “dual-energy filters.” 

The means for obtaining the information, therefore, might matter less than the ability to perform selective energy CT. The gaming industry shows how this might happen.

Ten years ago, Sony and Microsoft were locked in battle over Blu-ray and HD DVD.  Blu-ray won. But its victory did not stop Microsoft. Today Xbox One owners can download an app that allows them to play movies on Blu-ray disks, an app that matters less with each passing day as more movies and programs are streamed over the Internet.

The battle over selective energy technologies may be resolved in much the same way. If the concept of SECT proves itself clinically, energy-specific protocols might one day be provided by vendors to suit their machines, which will deliver the goods using whatever means they have handy, much as gaming consoles play movies today.

If so, it will conclude a battle in which everyone, most importantly the patient, wins … a battle that has only begun.

Greg Freiherr has reported on developments in radiology since 1983. He runs the consulting service, The Freiherr Group. Read more of his views on his blog at www.itnonline.com.

Related Content

Video Plus Brochure Helps Patients Make Lung Cancer Scan Decision

Image courtesy of the American Thoracic Society

News | Lung Cancer | April 19, 2019
A short video describing the potential benefits and risks of low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening for lung...
FDA Clears GE's Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Engine
Technology | Computed Tomography (CT) | April 19, 2019
GE Healthcare has received 510(k) clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of its Deep Learning Image...
Videos | RSNA | April 03, 2019
ITN Editor Dave Fornell takes a tour of some of the most interesting new medical imaging technologies displa
Johns Hopkins Medicine First in U.S. to Install Canon Medical's Aquilion Precision
News | Computed Tomography (CT) | March 26, 2019
March 26, 2019 — Johns Hopkins Medicine now has access to the first...
At #ACC.19, Siemens unveiled a version of its go.Top platform optimized for cardiovascular imaging. The newly packaged scanner can generate the data needed to do CT-based FFR (fractional flow reserve).

At #ACC.19, Siemens unveiled a version of its go.Top platform optimized for cardiovascular imaging. The newly packaged scanner can generate the data needed to do CT-based FFR (fractional flow reserve). Photo by Greg Freiherr

Feature | Cardiac Imaging | March 22, 2019 | By Greg Freiherr
Reflecting a trend toward the increased use of...
Researchers Use Radiomics to Predict Who Will Benefit from Chemotherapy
News | Radiomics | March 21, 2019
Using data from computed tomography (CT) images, researchers may be able to predict which lung cancer patients will...
HeartFlow Analysis Successfully Stratifies Heart Disease Patients at One Year
News | CT Angiography (CTA) | March 19, 2019
Late-breaking results confirm the HeartFlow FFRct (fractional flow reserve computed tomography) Analysis enables...
Podcast | Cardiac Imaging | March 15, 2019
Debate About Coronary Testing Highlights ACC Session
Canon Medical Introduces Entry-Level Aquilion Start CT
News | Computed Tomography (CT) | March 14, 2019
Canon Medical Systems Europe B.V. introduced the all-new Aquilion Start computed tomography (CT) system to the European...
Siemens Healthineers Debuts Cardiovascular Edition of Somatom go.Top CT
News | Computed Tomography (CT) | March 14, 2019
Siemens Healthineers will introduce the Somatom go.Top Cardiovascular Edition, a new version of its established...