News | Radiation Therapy | April 22, 2019

Medicaid Reimbursement for Radiation Therapy Varies Widely by State

Substantial differences in Medicaid compensation for standard-of-care breast cancer treatment indicate larger trend in cancer care

Comparison of state Medicaid fees for radiation oncology services for breast cancer and nonradiation oncology services per the Kaiser Family Foundation Index

Fig. 1: Comparison of state Medicaid fees for radiation oncology services for breast cancer and nonradiation oncology services per the Kaiser Family Foundation Index. (Agarwal et al, Red Journal, 2019) Credit: Elsevier

State Medicaid fees for a course of radiation therapy for breast cancer

Fig. 2: State Medicaid fees for a course of radiation therapy for breast cancer (excluding deep inspiratory breath hold). The Kaiser Family Foundation Fee Index for each state is plotted on the X axis and the total cost of care for a course of radiation therapy (fees for image guidance for respiratory tracking excluded) is plotted on the Y axis. The correlation coefficient of the Kaiser Family Foundation Index to the calculated entire episode of care fees for each state was 0.55. (Agarwal et al, Red Journal, 2019) Credit: Elsevier

April 22, 2019 — A new study finds wide state-by-state variations in Medicaid reimbursements to physicians who treat cancer patients with radiation therapies. These differences could compound existing disparities in access to healthcare in rural communities, which tend to have higher Medicaid coverage rates than metropolitan areas. The study is available for free access through April 24 in the International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (Red Journal), the flagship scientific journal of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO).1

“Roughly 66 million low-income Americans are enrolled in Medicaid, and we know from previous studies that these patients face disproportionate difficulty and delays getting the care they need,” said Ankit Agarwal, M.D., MBA, first author of the study and a radiation oncology resident physician at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. “With cancer care, timely treatment matters, and states that under-compensate for radiation therapy likely undermine patients’ health outcomes.”

For the analysis, researchers examined 2017 Medicaid fee schedules from 48 states and the District of Columbia2. Key findings included:

  • Fivefold difference in reimbursement rates: The average reimbursement for standard-of-care radiation therapy to treat breast cancer3 ranged from a low of $2,945 in New Hampshire, to a high of $15,218 in Delaware, with an overall average of $7,233 for an entire episode of care.
  • Radiation oncology disproportionately affected: The variation in radiation therapy payments outpaces the differences seen with other Medicaid reimbursements. Analysis of the Kaiser Family Foundation Medicaid-to-Medicare fee index for general medical services found that reimbursement ratios ranged from a low of 0.38 in Rhode Island to a high of 1.26 in Alaska — a threefold difference. By comparison, the authors’ index of radiation oncology payments showed a fivefold difference.

“Clinics that provide radiation therapy also have expensive fixed costs to purchase and maintain the equipment used for treatments. Inadequate and disproportionate Medicaid reimbursement rates — which already fall below comparable Medicare rates — can negatively impact the viability of facilities, especially in rural and private practice settings. Any reduction in the number of facilities in these areas can limit or remove patient access to these life-saving medical services,” explained Agarwal.

“Greater stability and fairness in Medicaid compensation would help stabilize access for Medicaid patients and make it more financially feasible for the physicians who care for them, especially in rural communities and those with fewer physicians overall. If left unaddressed, however, the disparity could aggravate the growing maldistribution of radiation oncologists in rural and urban communities — and place low-income patients in rural communities at even greater threat.”

For more information: www.redjournal.org

References

1. Agarwal A., Peterson J., Hoyle L., et al. Variations in Medicaid Payment Rates for Radiation Oncology. International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics, published online March 31, 2019. DOI: org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.02.031

2. Findings are based on Medicaid fee schedules from the fourth quarter of 2017, obtained from the state Medicaid websites or departments. Two states were not included in the analysis: Tennessee does not follow a Medicaid fee-for-service model, and Illinois’ fee schedule was incomplete.

3. The reference case was a patient who received hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer, using the deep inspiration breast hold (DIBH) technique and a radiation boost to the tumor bed. This clinical scenario is one of the most common in radiation oncology; Agarwal also noted that reimbursement for this treatment scenario is generally reflective of how radiation oncology is reimbursed for other commonly-treated sites.

Related Content

Stronger Distribution Networks to Bolster Radiotherapy Patient Positioning Accessories
News | Patient Positioning Radiation Therapy | July 19, 2019
A recent study projects global market revenues for radiotherapy patient positioning accessories will exceed revenues of...
IBM collected a dataset of 52,936 images from 13,234 women who underwent at least one mammogram between 2013 and 2017.

IBM collected a dataset of 52,936 images from 13,234 women who underwent at least one mammogram between 2013 and 2017, and who had health records for at least one year prior to the mammogram. The algorithm was trained on 9,611 mammograms. Image courtesy of Radiology.

Feature | Artificial Intelligence | July 19, 2019 | Michal Chorev
Breast cancer is the global leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women, and the most commonly diagnosed cancer...
CMS Proposes New Alternative Payment Model for Radiation Oncology
News | Radiation Oncology | July 17, 2019
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposal for an advanced alternative payment model (APM)...
AAPM 2019 Features More Than 40 Presentations on ViewRay's MRIdian MRI-guided Radiotherapy
News | Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) | July 16, 2019
ViewRay Inc. announced that the company's MRIdian System is the focus of more than 40 abstracts selected by the...
RaySearch Releases Version 3A of RayCare Oncology Information System
Technology | Oncology Information Management Systems (OIMS) | July 15, 2019
RaySearch has released RayCare 3A, a new version of the next-generation oncology information system (OIS). RayCare is...
IBA Launches Monte Carlo Patient QA for Varian Halcyon at AAPM 2019
Technology | Quality Assurance (QA) | July 10, 2019
IBA announced the launch of the latest functionality of the SciMoCa Monte Carlo Patient QA solution at the 61st annual...
Researchers Use Artificial Intelligence to Deliver Personalized Radiation Therapy
News | Radiation Therapy | July 09, 2019
New Cleveland Clinic-led research shows that artificial intelligence (AI) can use medical scans and health records to...
The Beamscan 3-D water phantom with the Varian Halcyon radiotherapy system

The Beamscan 3-D water phantom with the Varian Halcyon radiotherapy system. Image courtesy of PTW.

News | Quality Assurance (QA) | July 08, 2019
At this year’s American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) show, July 14-18 in San Antonio, Texas, PTW will...
Aktina Medical Partners With Elekta for Global Distribution of Interlocking SRS Cones
News | Radiation Therapy | July 05, 2019
Aktina Medical announced that Elekta Instrument AB, based in Sweden, will offer and distribute the Aktina line of...