Greg Freiherr, Industry Consultant

Greg Freiherr has reported on developments in radiology since 1983. He runs the consulting service, The Freiherr Group.

Blog | Greg Freiherr, Industry Consultant | December 15, 2011

Mammography’s Looming Dose War

By Greg Freiherr

As the dose wars in computed tomography (CT) draw to a close, a new one approaches, this one in mammography. The surprise should not be that this war is coming, but that it is taking so long to get here.

Mammography is the only imaging exam widely performed to screen apparently healthy people. It exposes them to ionizing radiation that, if administered in substantial quantities, can cause the very disease for which they are being screened. And it does so not once or twice, but annually for 30 or more years, per guidelines developed by the American Cancer Society (http://www.cancer.org/Healthy/FindCancerEarly/CancerScreeningGuidelines/american-cancer-society-guidelines-for-the-early-detection-of-cancer), with the understanding that the risk of cancer from radiation exposure increases with cumulative dose.

Yet, in the past, when questions about the benefit of such repetitive screening were raised, they were immediately and soundly rebuked by women’s health leaders who defended screening as a major, if not the primary, reason for declining deaths due to breast cancer.  Then why now do I believe dose will become an issue? Because the technology to reduce dose is finally available in the United States  – and being aggressively marketed on its ability to significantly cut patient radiation dose.

This product – Philips’ Microdose mammography product – like so much about mammography and radiation dose, is steeped in irony. It is not new.  It has been sold for years in Europe. But Microdose entered the U.S. only this fall after Philips Healthcare acquired Sectra’s mammography modality business operations.

Three months after this deal was final, during the RSNA annual meeting in November, the ability of this product to cut patient radiation dose was ballyhooed on the exhibit floor of the McCormick Center, on television, even on the sides of buses ferrying radiologists to and from the meeting. The message was inescapable. And it will become so again in the year ahead.

Much like what happened in CT, all the vendors of mammography equipment will have to climb onboard this bandwagon and they will have to do so quickly. They cannot cede the high ground of digital mammography to newcomer Philips, nor can they risk appearing unsympathetic to concerns about radiation dose, when tens of millions of American women undergo mammography every year.

With this, we can expect a new vernacular for the modality, one reliant on the use of “low,” “optimized,” “minimum” and “efficient” as  descriptors of dose administered by mammography equipment. Vendors will use several, possibly all, these descriptors in the same paragraph, if not the same sentence to define their products.

When that happens, it will be a sure sign that this new war has begun.

Related Content

News | Mammography | February 05, 2016
The January 2015 Harvard Women’s Health Watch discusses the new mammography guidelines from the U.S. Preventive...
medical imaging, low-dose radiation, cancer, LNT model study
News | Radiation Dose Management | February 04, 2016
The widespread belief that radiation from X rays, CT scans and other medical imaging can cause cancer is based on an...
breast density legislation

Information for this map courtesy DenseBreast-info.org

Feature | Breast Density | February 03, 2016 | Melinda Taschetta-Millane
Breast density notification is an ongoing topic that gained a lot of momentum in 2015, and continues to do so in 2016.
DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ, radiation therapy, survival benefit, Brigham and Women's Hospital study
News | Women's Health | February 02, 2016
Investigators from Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute have found that a set of...
Guided Therapeutics, Luviva Advanced Cervical Scan, Nairobi County Kenya, cervical cancer
News | Oncology Diagnostics | January 29, 2016
Guided Therapeutics Inc. announced that Nairobi County Health Services Sector has agreed to purchase an additional five...
Sectra, Best in KLAS 2015/2016, Breast Imaging PACS
News | Breast Imaging | January 29, 2016
For the third consecutive year, IT and medical technology company Sectra is ranked No. 1 by its U.S. customers and has...
Putting Patients First grant, 2015 winners, AHRA, Toshiba
News | Imaging | January 28, 2016
Seven leading healthcare providers have been selected as recipients of the eighth annual Putting Patients First grants...
UltraSPECT, 450th U.S. installation, Firelands Regional Medical Center, nuclear medicine, radiation safety
News | Nuclear Imaging | January 27, 2016
UltraSPECT Inc. has marked the 450th U.S. installation of its low-dose image processing technology for nuclear medicine...
Image Wisely, annual pledge process, medical imaging, radiation safety
News | Radiation Dose Management | January 27, 2016
Image Wisely participants must now make yearly commitments, as opposed to a one-time pledge, confirming their ongoing...
LifeImage, Mammosphere, mammography image exchange network, acquisition
News | Breast Imaging | January 26, 2016
lifeIMAGE announced that it has acquired Mammosphere, the leading national medical exchange network specializing in...
Overlay Init