Greg Freiherr, Industry Consultant
Greg Freiherr, Industry Consultant

Greg Freiherr has reported on developments in radiology since 1983. He runs the consulting service, The Freiherr Group.

Blog | Greg Freiherr, Industry Consultant | January 03, 2013

When Government Treads on Medical Practice

When Government Treads on Medical Practice

Dense breast tissues make mammograms (right) difficult to read, which may require complementary testing, such as MRI (left). Efforts by state legislatures mandating that physicians inform patients of the challenges of dense breast imaging raise both opportunity and risk for radiologists. Image courtesy Agfa Healthcare

For many years mammographers have been saddled with low reimbursements. Recognizing this, women’s health advocates lobbied successfully over the last decade for higher rates for mammograms produced with digital equipment.  

This may be the only exception to the “rule of less” that has been applied to imaging reimbursements since the federal Deficit Reduction Act (DRA) took effect in 2007. Cutbacks in reimbursement have at the very least slowed the growth of medical imaging procedures and led to a decline in the purchase of new imaging equipment, just as the increased reimbursement for digital mammography led to a boom in the purchase of full field digital systems that today dominate the landscape of women’s health.

While the federal government has been content to influence the practice of medicine through financial dictates, lately individual state governments have taken a more direct approach. Five states now mandate physicians to inform women with dense breasts that mammography may be of limited value for them. Connecticut, Virginia, Texas, California and New York require physicians to advise patients that complementary imaging studies, such as ultrasound or MRI, may be needed if dense fibroglandular tissues are likely to obscure the mammographic signs of cancer.

This legislation offers opportunity for radiologists, who might do what the RSNA at its last annual meeting advised members to do: “Be the voice of radiology for your patients.” They might educate and inform patients about the significance of breast density, as they are doing at the Elizabeth Wende Breast Clinic in Rochester, New York. They might also provide complementary testing. It is logical to expect that they do so. But stepping into this breach carries risk. (Editor’s Note: For more information, see Legislating Women’s Health: A Chance for Radiologists to Step In by Greg Freiherr at http://www.itnonline.com/content/legislating-women%E2%80%99s-health-chance-radiologists-step.)

Third party payers in the first states to adopt such mandated education have typically reimbursed for the ultrasound procedures that may follow, although such reimbursement is not required by law. And while ultrasound coverage may be provided, it is seldom there for the MRI exams that might be indicated for women with dense breasts at high risk of developing cancer. When reimbursement is not available, the laws do not address who should shoulder the costs.

And there are logistical challenges, as well. Few mammography practices have the capacity to perform ultrasound immediately following the determination that a patient has dense breasts. Even fewer can accommodate an MRI exam the same day. Patients found to have dense breasts and prescribed a complementary exam, therefore, may have to return for another appointment or travel to another facility, neither of which may be easy, particularly if they have traveled a long way already for their mammogram.  

Then there are fundamental problems with ultrasound and MRI. Their high sensitivity and lack of specificity lead inevitably to more biopsies and a preponderance of negative findings for procedures that otherwise would not have been performed, as illustrated by early experiences in the first state to enact such legislation, Connecticut.1

Consequently, legislative efforts of this type amount to little more than unfunded mandates that impose costs on insurance companies, practitioners and patients. While they may provide an opportunity for radiologists to become more involved with patients, radiologists must be careful in how they respond to this opportunity, as these mandates may expose them to risks that can endanger the very relationships that the mandates foster.

At least when the federal government seeks to influence medical practice, it foots the bill … albeit at a cut rate.

 

Reference:

1.  Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology. 2012;265:59-69. Abstract: http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/22723501

 

Related Content

GE Healthcare and Premier Inc. Developing One-stop Breast Clinic Model for U.S.
News | Mammography | October 21, 2019
GE Healthcare and Premier Inc. have announced a collaboration to develop a model to bring a same-day breast cancer...
Densitas Breast Density Assessment Software Joins Nuance AI Marketplace
News | Breast Density | October 21, 2019
Densitas Inc. announced that its U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared densitas densityai breast density...
The Revolution Apex intelligent computed tomography (CT) scanner

The Revolution Apex intelligent computed tomography (CT) scanner. Image courtesy of GE Healthcare.

News | RSNA | October 18, 2019
At the 2019 annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA 2019), Dec. 1-6 in Chicago, GE Healthcare...
A patient prepares to have a tomosynthesis-guided prone breast biopsy using the Hologic Affirm prone biopsy system.

A patient prepares to have a tomosynthesis-guided prone breast biopsy using the Hologic Affirm prone biopsy system.

Feature | Breast Biopsy Systems | October 17, 2019 | By Harriet Borofsky, M.D.
The current body of research supporting...
An illustration of radiology department analytics data showing GE Healthcare’s business analytics software.

An illustration of radiology department analytics data showing GE Healthcare’s business analytics software.

Feature | Radiology Business | October 17, 2019 | By April Wilson
According to IBM, the world creates 2.5 quintillion bytes of data daily.
Image courtesy of Bethesda Health

Image courtesy of Bethesda Health

Feature | Radiology Business | October 17, 2019 | By Susan DeCathelineau
Few professions have experienced the dramatic changes that radiologists have over the past few years.
Using Compressed SENSE for faster MRI scans, healthcare providers can transform their radiology workflow.

Using Compressed SENSE for faster MRI scans, healthcare providers can transform their radiology workflow.

Sponsored Content | Case Study | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | October 16, 2019
Since the introduction of magnetic resonan...
Feature | Artificial Intelligence | October 16, 2019 | By Siddharth (Sid) Shah
The period between November through February is pretty interesting for the field of medical imaging — two major confe
Feature | Breast Imaging | October 16, 2019 | By Jeff Zagoudis
On Jan. 1, 2017, the U.S.
At the annual meeting of the AHRA, Agfa Healthcare demonstrated a full-scale model of its DR 800, presenting the unit as a "game changer" for its multifunctionality.

At the annual meeting of the AHRA, Agfa Healthcare demonstrated a full-scale model of its DR 800, presenting the unit as a "game changer" for its multifunctionality.

Feature | AHRA | October 16, 2019 | By Greg Freiherr
Diversity was on display at the Association for Medical Imaging Mana...